Take the 2-minute tour ×
Politics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people interested in governments, policies, and political processes. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Besides Nevada having the option to vote none of the above (NOTA) are there any other places in the world which allow for voters to tick NOTA?

If this is the case, are there any studies on the effect of having such an option? Does it increase voter turnout?

share|improve this question
Do you make a distinction between voting blank and voting "none of the above"? I think many countries have the ability to vote blank (at least all three countries in which I've ever participated in elections did) without the vote being invalid. –  gerrit Dec 13 '12 at 12:40
@gerrit I believe there is potentially a difference between voting for no one, and voting for "none of the above" - in that a blank vote is usually discounted as "I don't care" or "I don't know", whereas a vote for "none of the above" means "I do not agree to any of the above candidates representing me"... If this is the case Sven is getting at, what would happen if "none" gained the majority of the vote? –  Graham Wager Dec 13 '12 at 13:36
Generally in an election somebody needs to win; the system doesn't have the option of saying "well, there's no consensus, so the previously elected people will just stay on and we'll try again in a few years". Somebody has to be selected, so voting for nobody is equivalent to not voting –  Michael Mrozek Dec 13 '12 at 16:29
wrong, you could imagine having a quorum you need to pass before getting elected, abstention is normally not counted towards the quorum, but NOTA would be, this is why it is an interesting question. And who says you need to wait years before having the next election? –  Sven Clement Dec 13 '12 at 21:51

3 Answers 3

There are several different "none of these" options that have been implemented. Many of them are only implemented in private elections (as distinct from public elections; e.g. elections within unions or student elections or internal elections in political parties).

One is "Re-Open Nominations" (aka RON). If elected, then the nominations have to be re-opened and then the election re-run. Sometimes, those nominated the first time are ineligible to be nominated again.

A second possible result is to create a casual vacancy (as if the elected person had died in office), which is then filled by the normal mechanism for filling a vacancy. If that normal mechanism is a by-election (US: special election) then this is effectively the same as RON*. But it may not be; for instance US Senators are elected, but vacancies are filled with appointment by the state's governor; the President is elected, but a vacancy is filled by the Vice-President; VP vacancies are filled by Presidential appointment and confirmation by both Houses of Congress.

A third possible result is that the office will sit unfilled for one term and its powers cannot be exercised for that term. This is more common with elections to committees or parliaments than for executive office - the parliament is just one member short for a few years.

In a primary election, the result of NOTA winning is usually that that party will not contest the election. In primaries that are closed, especially ones that are narrowly closed (like US caucuses, or French-style primaries that are only open to dues-paying members), the option not to contest the election may be used to concentrate the party's resources on particular elections.

* There may be technical differences between a by-election and a rerun of the normal election. For example, in the UK, the expenditure limits are higher for by-elections than for re-run elections. In the US, different rules may apply for primary elections for a special election than apply for a general election, and not all states have rules for a rerun general election at all (reruns can apply if, for example, a candidate dies too late for their name to be removed from ballots, as well as for a victory by NOTA/RON).

share|improve this answer

NOTA in Nevada is non-binding: the highest placed candidate gets the seat

Votos en blanco in Colombia is binding: elections are re-run if over 50%

Declined ballots in some provinces in Canada are non-binding but three provinces publish the official stats in election results

NOTA in Russia was binding but this has been removed from legislation.

Vote blanc in france is non binding

Votos en blanco in spain is non binding but stats are published

share|improve this answer
It has been shown in nevada to have no effect on turnout but this may be because it is non binding. A binding form may have more effect. –  Neil Sep 4 '13 at 20:27

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/None_of_the_above has some examples:

Greece (λευκό, white, but unrelated to a political party of the similarly sounding name-however it is symbolic only), the U.S. state of Nevada (None of These Candidates), Ukraine (Проти всіх), Spain (voto en blanco), and Colombia (voto en blanco). Russia had such an option on its ballots (Против всех) until it was abolished in 2006. Bangladesh introduced this option (না ভোট) in 2008.

share|improve this answer
This is not a complete answer. It appears the original poster was more interested in the potential political effect of the NOTA offering. To just post links that inform, but do not answer the question, stick to comments on the question. –  Michael Kingsmill Dec 13 '12 at 3:07
in effect, I'm more interested in the effects than in the list of things answer where such a system has been implemented before, I just felt it necessary to include it in the question to make it complete –  Sven Clement Dec 13 '12 at 21:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.