Timeline for Why were pre-election polls and forecast models inconsistent with the election of Donald Trump?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2018 at 20:52 | history | edited | agc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added URL, corrected name of VRA65.
|
| Aug 2, 2018 at 5:41 | history | edited | agc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor corrections.
|
| S Nov 15, 2016 at 11:13 | history | suggested | agc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 'Crosscheck' info
|
| Nov 15, 2016 at 8:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 15, 2016 at 11:13 | |||||
| Nov 14, 2016 at 6:00 | comment | added | agc | This answer should probably include a corollary of deliberate voter suppression, namely media providing meager coverage of voter suppression, and then post-election, obsessive media over-coverage of complex statistical critiques of exit polls whilst ignoring the possibility that accurate exit polls would imply things like voter suppression, voter fraud, computer ballot box stuffing or cracking, (for which there is some historic precedent), etc. If so, this week's plethora of self-flagellating pollsters might well be practicing their profession's most cynical self-preservation strategy. | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 5:38 | history | edited | chx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 85 characters in body
|
| S Nov 14, 2016 at 5:36 | history | suggested | agc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
More detail.
|
| Nov 14, 2016 at 3:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 14, 2016 at 5:36 | |||||
| Nov 13, 2016 at 18:35 | history | answered | chx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |