Timeline for Did Trump use social media successfully to gain votes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2017 at 20:32 | history | edited | user11249 |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:54 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://politics.stackexchange.com/ with https://politics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 18, 2016 at 1:23 | comment | added | MrLore | Speaking of "Fake News", who came up with this idea that's been the talking point of every news channel in the last couple of days? Isn't it interesting that they're all also advocating silencing everyone who disagrees with their narrative. | |
| Nov 17, 2016 at 17:38 | answer | added | user24113 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 18:43 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 17, 2016 at 17:58 | |||||
| Nov 15, 2016 at 17:23 | comment | added | hownowbrowncow | @Celeritas the polls weren't a reflection of reality -- they were an attempt to project reality. HuffingtonPost 98% for clinton victory, bigggest joke I know. | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 16:34 | comment | added | user9790 | You might be able to see some correlation, but you won't outside of direct polling, get to a definitive answer. Trump used social media is true, and Trump won votes is true, but there were a tremendous amount of other factors that decide votes. In any event, his twitter account seemed to be the most used and abused of his preferred media. | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 15:19 | answer | added | Brythan | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 11:09 | history | notice added | Philipp♦ | Needs detailed answers | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 11:05 | history | reopened | Philipp♦ | ||
| Nov 15, 2016 at 6:06 | comment | added | Celeritas | @blip it is no more speculative than "Why were pre-election polls and forecast models so wrong about Donald Trump?" which is extremely well received | |
| S Nov 15, 2016 at 1:36 | history | migration rejected | |||
| S Nov 15, 2016 at 1:36 | history | unlocked | CommunityBot | ||
| S Nov 15, 2016 at 0:32 | history | migrated |
user1530 Philipp♦ |
to skeptics.stackexchange.com | |
| S Nov 15, 2016 at 0:32 | history | locked | CommunityBot | ||
| S Nov 15, 2016 at 0:32 | history | closed |
user1530 Philipp♦ |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 0:32 | answer | added | Helene | timeline score: -1 | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 0:13 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 15, 2016 at 0:41 | |||||
| Nov 14, 2016 at 23:53 | comment | added | user1530 | It would certainly seem so, but I don't know if there's any definitive way to say one way or the other. It's all speculation, is it not? | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 23:52 | history | edited | Brythan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 14, 2016 at 22:59 | history | edited | Celeritas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 276 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2016 at 22:53 | answer | added | user24527 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 22:52 | comment | added | Batman | I would suggest taking this question to Skeptics, since you have a very specific claim you want fact-checked. | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 22:39 | comment | added | Batman | Social media isn't exactly a "tech savvy" endeavor. | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 22:34 | history | asked | Celeritas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |