|
|
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/800950833089220608
|
occurred Nov 22 '16 at 6:35
|
|
|
3
|
|
edited Nov 21 '16 at 14:11
yannis♦
8,87155 gold badges4747 silver badges7171 bronze badges
|
Firstly, I hope this is the correct place to ask. I am sure that Worldbuilding SE would accept it, and maybe CrossValidated SE, or even Mathematics SE
Driving to work this morning, I heard about the upset in the French primaries, and the announcer stated that “the French say that they do not vote for someone, but, rather, against someone”.
Of course, I am aware of tactical voting, but what if we took that literally?
If each person had a choice of voting +1 for a candidate, or -1 against another, would there be any significant change in outcome? Would things drift towards the centre, for instance, or is it a zero sum game?
Would there be marked difference in effect on different systems of voting, such as winner takes all and proportional representation?
I am sure that it would have ramifications which I cannot foresee, so thought that I would ask here.
Firstly, I hope this is the correct place to ask. I am sure that Worldbuilding SE would accept it, and maybe CrossValidated SE, or even Mathematics SE
Driving to work this morning, I heard about the upset in the French primaries, and the announcer stated that “the French say that they do not vote for someone, but, rather, against someone”.
Of course, I am aware of tactical voting, but what if we took that literally?
If each person had a choice of voting +1 for a candidate, or -1 against another, would there be any significant change in outcome? Would things drift towards the centre, for instance, or is it a zero sum game?
Would there be marked difference in effect on different systems of voting, such as winner takes all and proportional representation?
I am sure that it would have ramifications which I cannot foresee, so thought that I would ask here.
Driving to work this morning, I heard about the upset in the French primaries, and the announcer stated that “the French say that they do not vote for someone, but, rather, against someone”.
Of course, I am aware of tactical voting, but what if we took that literally?
If each person had a choice of voting +1 for a candidate, or -1 against another, would there be any significant change in outcome? Would things drift towards the centre, for instance, or is it a zero sum game?
Would there be marked difference in effect on different systems of voting, such as winner takes all and proportional representation?
I am sure that it would have ramifications which I cannot foresee, so thought that I would ask here.
|
|
|
2
|
|
Rathony
1,69066 silver badges2626 bronze badges
|
What would be the effetceffect of allowing voting against aparticulara particular candidate?
Firstly, I hope that this is the correct place to ask. I am sure that http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/Worldbuilding SE would accept it, and maybe http://stats.stackexchange.com/CrossValidated SE, or even http://math.stackexchange.com/.Mathematics SE
Driving to work this morning, I heard about the upset in the French primaries, and the announcer stated that, “the French say that they do not vote for someone, but, rather, against someone”.
Of course, I am aware of tactical voting, but what if we took that literally?
If each person had a choice of voting +1 for a candidate, or -1 against another, would there be any significant change in outcome? Would things drift towards the centre, for instance, or is it a zero sum game?
Would there be marked difference in effect on different systems of voting, such as winner takes all and proportional representation?
I am sure that it would have ramifications which I cannot foresee, so thought that I would ask here.
What would be the effetc of allowing voting against aparticular candidate?
Firstly, I hope that this is the correct place to ask. I am sure that http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/ would accept it, and maybe http://stats.stackexchange.com/, or even http://math.stackexchange.com/.
Driving to work this morning, I heard about the upset in the French primaries, and the announcer stated that, “the French say that they do not vote for someone, but, rather, against someone”.
Of course, I am aware of tactical voting, but what if we took that literally?
If each person had a choice of voting +1 for a candidate, or -1 against another, would there be any significant change in outcome? Would things drift towards the centre, for instance, or is it a zero sum game?
Would there be marked difference in effect on different systems of voting, such as winner takes all and proportional representation?
I am sure that it would have ramifications which I cannot foresee, so thought that I would ask here.
What would be the effect of allowing voting against a particular candidate?
Firstly, I hope this is the correct place to ask. I am sure that Worldbuilding SE would accept it, and maybe CrossValidated SE, or even Mathematics SE
Driving to work this morning, I heard about the upset in the French primaries, and the announcer stated that “the French say that they do not vote for someone, but, rather, against someone”.
Of course, I am aware of tactical voting, but what if we took that literally?
If each person had a choice of voting +1 for a candidate, or -1 against another, would there be any significant change in outcome? Would things drift towards the centre, for instance, or is it a zero sum game?
Would there be marked difference in effect on different systems of voting, such as winner takes all and proportional representation?
I am sure that it would have ramifications which I cannot foresee, so thought that I would ask here.
|
|
|
1
|
|
asked Nov 21 '16 at 13:00
Mawg
72966 silver badges1212 bronze badges
|
What would be the effetc of allowing voting against aparticular candidate?
Firstly, I hope that this is the correct place to ask. I am sure that http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/ would accept it, and maybe http://stats.stackexchange.com/, or even http://math.stackexchange.com/.
Driving to work this morning, I heard about the upset in the French primaries, and the announcer stated that, “the French say that they do not vote for someone, but, rather, against someone”.
Of course, I am aware of tactical voting, but what if we took that literally?
If each person had a choice of voting +1 for a candidate, or -1 against another, would there be any significant change in outcome? Would things drift towards the centre, for instance, or is it a zero sum game?
Would there be marked difference in effect on different systems of voting, such as winner takes all and proportional representation?
I am sure that it would have ramifications which I cannot foresee, so thought that I would ask here.
|
|