Timeline for Are the votes counted by a voting machine with tampered seals valid?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2016 at 5:52 | answer | added | Melissa Thomas | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 4, 2016 at 22:40 | comment | added | agc | @user4012, thank you for the compliment... the (fuzzy) answer: I don't know much about voting nowadays, and find these last few months almost as puzzling as the confidence some people seem to have in and about them. Also this isn't a bad place to ask... | |
| Dec 4, 2016 at 19:56 | comment | added | user4012 | I'm mildly and idly curious where you get info for your questions (just to be clear, they are great questions! ) | |
| Dec 4, 2016 at 18:16 | answer | added | Brythan | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 4, 2016 at 17:13 | comment | added | SJuan76 | As a matter of fact, it is an anti-tampering seal... but only in relation to the commercial warranty of the machines, which has nothing to do with their testing and certification for the voting process. In fact I would expect any serious certification procedure to involve breaking that seal, to check what is the HW inside the machines ("hey! why is there a smartphone circuit connected here"), but in any case you should check Wisconsin's certification procedure to know what to expect/detect. | |
| Dec 4, 2016 at 17:01 | history | edited | Brythan |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 4, 2016 at 15:39 | comment | added | user9790 | It's a warranty sticker. It's not some seal that indicates tampering or improper access | |
| Dec 4, 2016 at 15:38 | history | edited | agc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo.
|
| Dec 4, 2016 at 15:29 | history | asked | agc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |