Timeline for How did states react to the DEA?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 24, 2019 at 7:10 | comment | added | user4951 | and that wickard filburn is like mixed decisions by supreme court right? Another dice roll and it'll crumble | |
Feb 28, 2017 at 1:41 | comment | added | Drunk Cynic | Precedent has been set that the Commerce Clause applies to intrastate commerce that would indirectly affect interstate commerce: Wickard v. Filburn. " The Court decided that Filburn's wheat growing activities reduced the amount of wheat he would buy for animal feed on the open market, which is traded nationally (interstate), and is therefore within the purview of the Commerce Clause" - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn | |
Feb 28, 2017 at 1:38 | comment | added | Drunk Cynic | There are buttons on your keyboard that allow for letters to be capitalized. | |
Feb 27, 2017 at 15:18 | comment | added | user1530 | I'm not sure I'm following. Are you saying the push back on the state laws is an elaborate ruse to eventually de-legitimize federal oversight of drug laws? | |
Feb 26, 2017 at 12:04 | history | answered | dannyf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |