Timeline for Why do governments support remote settlements with negligible economic significance?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2017 at 17:43 | comment | added | user9389 | also xkcd says the crown needs those particular islands to avoid sunset. | |
| May 28, 2017 at 17:16 | comment | added | SleepingGod | @JonathanReez the tens of millions of dollars going to rural alaska, are if you read your article carefully going to improve airstrips and airports. Alaska is rather close to Americas no.1 enemy Russia. Spending money to improve airports there makes sense. | |
| May 28, 2017 at 17:14 | comment | added | JonathanReez | The Pitcairn Islands kind of make sense. But what about rural Alaska? | |
| May 28, 2017 at 17:03 | history | answered | SleepingGod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |