Skip to main content
science and technology improtance for infrastructure
Source Link
Val
  • 197
  • 1
  • 7

The Venus Project advocates for a resource-based economy)

The term and meaning of a Resource Based Economy was originated by Jacque Fresco. It is a holistic socio-economic system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter or any other system of debt or servitude. All resources become the common heritage of all of the inhabitants, not just a select few. The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource; our practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is irrelevant and counter productive to our survival.

Communism as envisioned my Marx in his Communist Manifesto

the management of industry by individuals necessarily implies private property, and since competition is in reality merely the manner and form in which the control of industry by private property owners expresses itself, it follows that private property cannot be separated from competition and the individual management of industry. Private property must, therefore, be abolished and in its place must come the common utilization of all instruments of production and the distribution of all products according to common agreement – in a word, what is called the communal ownership of goods.

Though I see that dogmatic Marxists concentrate on the instruments of production, I see that the idea of communism (and many communists) is not limited to that. com-unism means "to unite" that all people on the planet must be brothers rather than consider each other as rivals and tools to make wealth. This is what J.Fresco promotes. Both Zeitgest and communists unveil us how capitalist market and greediness create problems in our society, both disregard the money in favour of real resource management and advocate the common property along with rational social planning (socialism) based on natural resource and science rather than money (education of Nature is a source of tensions Marxists with church). This implies creation of global technological superstructures-based (public) infrastructure in both cases.

. Might be you noticed even more common properties.

Is it right to consider the communism as such a broad category? (not just as dogmatic Marxsim?)

How to determine if movement falls into the category of Communism or not?

In what way does Zeitgest differ from Communism? (might be the anarchist branch of it)

Why cannot we say that J.Fresco is a communist and promotes the communism?

The Venus Project advocates for a resource-based economy)

The term and meaning of a Resource Based Economy was originated by Jacque Fresco. It is a holistic socio-economic system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter or any other system of debt or servitude. All resources become the common heritage of all of the inhabitants, not just a select few. The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource; our practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is irrelevant and counter productive to our survival.

Communism as envisioned my Marx in his Communist Manifesto

the management of industry by individuals necessarily implies private property, and since competition is in reality merely the manner and form in which the control of industry by private property owners expresses itself, it follows that private property cannot be separated from competition and the individual management of industry. Private property must, therefore, be abolished and in its place must come the common utilization of all instruments of production and the distribution of all products according to common agreement – in a word, what is called the communal ownership of goods.

Though I see that dogmatic Marxists concentrate on the instruments of production, I see that the idea of communism (and many communists) is not limited to that. com-unism means "to unite" that all people on the planet must be brothers rather than consider each other as rivals and tools to make wealth. This is what J.Fresco promotes. Both Zeitgest and communists unveil us how capitalist market and greediness create problems in our society, both disregard the money in favour of real resource management and advocate the common property along with rational social planning (socialism). Might be you noticed even more common properties.

Is it right to consider the communism as such a broad category? (not just as dogmatic Marxsim?)

How to determine if movement falls into the category of Communism or not?

In what way does Zeitgest differ from Communism? (might be the anarchist branch of it)

Why cannot we say that J.Fresco is a communist and promotes the communism?

The Venus Project advocates for a resource-based economy)

The term and meaning of a Resource Based Economy was originated by Jacque Fresco. It is a holistic socio-economic system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter or any other system of debt or servitude. All resources become the common heritage of all of the inhabitants, not just a select few. The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource; our practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is irrelevant and counter productive to our survival.

Communism as envisioned my Marx in his Communist Manifesto

the management of industry by individuals necessarily implies private property, and since competition is in reality merely the manner and form in which the control of industry by private property owners expresses itself, it follows that private property cannot be separated from competition and the individual management of industry. Private property must, therefore, be abolished and in its place must come the common utilization of all instruments of production and the distribution of all products according to common agreement – in a word, what is called the communal ownership of goods.

Though I see that dogmatic Marxists concentrate on the instruments of production, I see that the idea of communism (and many communists) is not limited to that. com-unism means "to unite" that all people on the planet must be brothers rather than consider each other as rivals and tools to make wealth. This is what J.Fresco promotes. Both Zeitgest and communists unveil us how capitalist market and greediness create problems in our society, both advocate the common property along with rational social planning (socialism) based on natural resource and science rather than money (education of Nature is a source of tensions Marxists with church). This implies creation of global technological superstructures-based (public) infrastructure in both cases.

. Might be you noticed even more common properties.

Is it right to consider the communism as such a broad category? (not just as dogmatic Marxsim?)

How to determine if movement falls into the category of Communism or not?

In what way does Zeitgest differ from Communism? (might be the anarchist branch of it)

Why cannot we say that J.Fresco is a communist and promotes the communism?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPolitics/status/384699663586451456
Zeitgest as anarchis communism
Source Link
Val
  • 197
  • 1
  • 7

The Venus Project advocates for a resource-based economy)

The term and meaning of a Resource Based Economy was originated by Jacque Fresco. It is a holistic socio-economic system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter or any other system of debt or servitude. All resources become the common heritage of all of the inhabitants, not just a select few. The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource; our practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is irrelevant and counter productive to our survival.

Communism as envisioned my Marx in his Communist Manifesto

the management of industry by individuals necessarily implies private property, and since competition is in reality merely the manner and form in which the control of industry by private property owners expresses itself, it follows that private property cannot be separated from competition and the individual management of industry. Private property must, therefore, be abolished and in its place must come the common utilization of all instruments of production and the distribution of all products according to common agreement – in a word, what is called the communal ownership of goods.

Though I see that dogmatic Marxists concentrate on the instruments of production, I see that the idea of communism (and many communists) is not limited to that. com-unism means "to unite" that all people on the planet must be brothers rather than consider each other as rivals and tools to make wealth. This is what J.Fresco promotes. Both Zeitgest and communists unveil us how capitalist market and greediness create problems in our society, both disregard the money in favour of real resource management and advocate the common property along with rational social planning (socialism). Might be you noticed even more common properties.

Is it right to consider the communism as such a broad category? not(not just as dogmatic Marxsim?)

How to determine if movement falls into the category of Communism or not?

In what way does Zeitgest differ from Communism? (might be the anarchist branch of it)

Why cannot we say that J.Fresco is a communist and promotes the communism?

The Venus Project advocates for a resource-based economy)

The term and meaning of a Resource Based Economy was originated by Jacque Fresco. It is a holistic socio-economic system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter or any other system of debt or servitude. All resources become the common heritage of all of the inhabitants, not just a select few. The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource; our practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is irrelevant and counter productive to our survival.

Communism as envisioned my Marx in his Communist Manifesto

the management of industry by individuals necessarily implies private property, and since competition is in reality merely the manner and form in which the control of industry by private property owners expresses itself, it follows that private property cannot be separated from competition and the individual management of industry. Private property must, therefore, be abolished and in its place must come the common utilization of all instruments of production and the distribution of all products according to common agreement – in a word, what is called the communal ownership of goods.

Though I see that dogmatic Marxists concentrate on the instruments of production, I see that the idea of communism (and many communists) is not limited to that. com-unism means "to unite" that all people on the planet must be brothers rather than consider each other as rivals and tools to make wealth. This is what J.Fresco promotes. Both Zeitgest and communists unveil us how capitalist market and greediness create problems in our society, both disregard the money in favour of real resource management and advocate the common property along with rational social planning (socialism). Might be you noticed even more common properties.

Is it right to consider the communism as such a broad category? not just as dogmatic Marxsim?

How to determine if movement falls into the category of Communism or not?

In what way does Zeitgest differ from Communism?

Why cannot we say that J.Fresco is a communist and promotes the communism?

The Venus Project advocates for a resource-based economy)

The term and meaning of a Resource Based Economy was originated by Jacque Fresco. It is a holistic socio-economic system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter or any other system of debt or servitude. All resources become the common heritage of all of the inhabitants, not just a select few. The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource; our practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is irrelevant and counter productive to our survival.

Communism as envisioned my Marx in his Communist Manifesto

the management of industry by individuals necessarily implies private property, and since competition is in reality merely the manner and form in which the control of industry by private property owners expresses itself, it follows that private property cannot be separated from competition and the individual management of industry. Private property must, therefore, be abolished and in its place must come the common utilization of all instruments of production and the distribution of all products according to common agreement – in a word, what is called the communal ownership of goods.

Though I see that dogmatic Marxists concentrate on the instruments of production, I see that the idea of communism (and many communists) is not limited to that. com-unism means "to unite" that all people on the planet must be brothers rather than consider each other as rivals and tools to make wealth. This is what J.Fresco promotes. Both Zeitgest and communists unveil us how capitalist market and greediness create problems in our society, both disregard the money in favour of real resource management and advocate the common property along with rational social planning (socialism). Might be you noticed even more common properties.

Is it right to consider the communism as such a broad category? (not just as dogmatic Marxsim?)

How to determine if movement falls into the category of Communism or not?

In what way does Zeitgest differ from Communism? (might be the anarchist branch of it)

Why cannot we say that J.Fresco is a communist and promotes the communism?

Post Reopened by user1873, Affable Geek
How to determine if movement falls into the category 'Communism' or not?
Source Link
Val
  • 197
  • 1
  • 7

The Venus Project advocates for a resource-based economy)

The term and meaning of a Resource Based Economy was originated by Jacque Fresco. It is a holistic socio-economic system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter or any other system of debt or servitude. All resources become the common heritage of all of the inhabitants, not just a select few. The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource; our practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is irrelevant and counter productive to our survival.

Communism as envisioned my Marx in his Communist Manifesto

the management of industry by individuals necessarily implies private property, and since competition is in reality merely the manner and form in which the control of industry by private property owners expresses itself, it follows that private property cannot be separated from competition and the individual management of industry. Private property must, therefore, be abolished and in its place must come the common utilization of all instruments of production and the distribution of all products according to common agreement – in a word, what is called the communal ownership of goods.

Though I see that dogmatic Marxists concentrate on the instruments of production, I see that the idea of communism (and many communists) is not limited to that. com-unism means "to unite" that all people on the planet must be brothers rather than consider each other as rivals and tools to make wealth. This is what J.Fresco promotes. Both Zeitgest and communists unveil us how capitalist market and greediness create problems in our society, both disregard the money in favour of real resource management and advocate the common property along with rational social planning (socialism). Might be you noticed even more common properties.

Is it right to consider the communism as such a broad category? not just as dogmatic Marxsim?

How to determine if movement falls into the category of Communism or not?

In what way does itZeitgest differ from Communism?

Why cannot we say that J.Fresco is a communist and promotes the communism?

The Venus Project advocates for a resource-based economy)

The term and meaning of a Resource Based Economy was originated by Jacque Fresco. It is a holistic socio-economic system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter or any other system of debt or servitude. All resources become the common heritage of all of the inhabitants, not just a select few. The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource; our practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is irrelevant and counter productive to our survival.

Communism as envisioned my Marx in his Communist Manifesto

the management of industry by individuals necessarily implies private property, and since competition is in reality merely the manner and form in which the control of industry by private property owners expresses itself, it follows that private property cannot be separated from competition and the individual management of industry. Private property must, therefore, be abolished and in its place must come the common utilization of all instruments of production and the distribution of all products according to common agreement – in a word, what is called the communal ownership of goods.

Though I see that dogmatic Marxists concentrate on the instruments of production, I see that the idea of communism (and many communists) is not limited to that. com-unism means "to unite" that all people on the planet must be brothers rather than consider each other as rivals and tools to make wealth. This is what J.Fresco promotes. Both Zeitgest and communists unveil us how capitalist market and greediness create problems in our society, both disregard the money in favour of real resource management and advocate the common property along with rational social planning (socialism). Might be you noticed even more common properties.

Is it right to consider the communism as such a broad category? not just as dogmatic Marxsim?

In what way does it differ from Communism?

Why cannot we say that J.Fresco is a communist and promotes the communism?

The Venus Project advocates for a resource-based economy)

The term and meaning of a Resource Based Economy was originated by Jacque Fresco. It is a holistic socio-economic system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter or any other system of debt or servitude. All resources become the common heritage of all of the inhabitants, not just a select few. The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource; our practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is irrelevant and counter productive to our survival.

Communism as envisioned my Marx in his Communist Manifesto

the management of industry by individuals necessarily implies private property, and since competition is in reality merely the manner and form in which the control of industry by private property owners expresses itself, it follows that private property cannot be separated from competition and the individual management of industry. Private property must, therefore, be abolished and in its place must come the common utilization of all instruments of production and the distribution of all products according to common agreement – in a word, what is called the communal ownership of goods.

Though I see that dogmatic Marxists concentrate on the instruments of production, I see that the idea of communism (and many communists) is not limited to that. com-unism means "to unite" that all people on the planet must be brothers rather than consider each other as rivals and tools to make wealth. This is what J.Fresco promotes. Both Zeitgest and communists unveil us how capitalist market and greediness create problems in our society, both disregard the money in favour of real resource management and advocate the common property along with rational social planning (socialism). Might be you noticed even more common properties.

Is it right to consider the communism as such a broad category? not just as dogmatic Marxsim?

How to determine if movement falls into the category of Communism or not?

In what way does Zeitgest differ from Communism?

Why cannot we say that J.Fresco is a communist and promotes the communism?

please do not remove the common properties that I have drawn. I think that they are more important than the pieces of Manifests.
Source Link
Val
  • 197
  • 1
  • 7
Loading
Made the question in to an objective question instead of a retorical rant.
Source Link
user1873
  • 14.1k
  • 4
  • 40
  • 94
Loading
Post Closed as "Opinion-based" by Affable Geek
Source Link
Val
  • 197
  • 1
  • 7
Loading