Timeline for Does Anonymous have a coherent ideology?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2012 at 18:41 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 12, 2012 at 10:54 | |||||
| Dec 11, 2012 at 0:57 | comment | added | user4012 | @StasM - Anonymous seems to protest every random thing around :) | |
| Dec 10, 2012 at 19:13 | comment | added | StasM | @DVK If you want Iran, it's only a google away :) businesspundit.com/… As for specific protests about stoning - I didn't find those but this doesn't mean they do not oppose it - you can not protest everything... | |
| Dec 10, 2012 at 16:29 | comment | added | user4012 | @StasM - since your URL gives me "Sevice Not Available", I will make up a conspiracy theory that it was indeed taken out by Anonymous and this proves me right :) Also, in all seriousness, Syria is a pretty poor example, since 100% of Arab states aside from Iran oppos Al Assad at this point. I meant things like protesting Saudi Arabia over its treatment of women, or Iran over stoning of apostasists or gays. | |
| Dec 10, 2012 at 8:35 | comment | added | StasM | @DVK I do not need to try - this was already tried, for example: mashable.com/2011/08/08/anonymous-syria | |
| Dec 9, 2012 at 5:49 | comment | added | user4012 | @StasM - Probably a valid guess. But go and try and organize an Anonymous protest against an Arab regime (on any grounds) and see how successful you will be. | |
| Dec 7, 2012 at 23:40 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 7, 2012 at 7:18 | comment | added | StasM | I'm not sure there are such protests at the level of Anonymous actions at all - i.e. it may be that target demographic audience of Anonymous just does not have enough individuals that oppose this particular legislation and are inclined to protest in such ways. | |
| Dec 7, 2012 at 2:33 | comment | added | user97 | An interesting perspective ... perhaps it makes more sense to consider Anonymous as a framework within which political actors can operate, rather than a political actor in itself, then? Nevertheless, there does seem to be some kind of limitation on what is and isn't considered a viable cause to promote via Anonymous. I don't study the group closely (I'm a bit old for 4chan), but I haven't heard of the name being used as cover for (for example) protests against proposals for marriage equality legislation. | |
| Dec 7, 2012 at 2:00 | history | answered | StasM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |