Timeline for Why is there no paid maternity leave in United States (federal level)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Nov 10, 2017 at 15:26 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
S Nov 10, 2017 at 15:26 | comment | added | Sam I am says Reinstate Monica | Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. | |
Nov 6, 2017 at 19:34 | comment | added | jamesqf | @Magisch: You can't prevent employers from passing on costs. If they don't, they will be operating at a loss, and will eventually go bankrupt. And if they do pass on enough of the costs, competitors in lower cost areas can undercut their prices and so drive them out of business. E.g. China. | |
Nov 6, 2017 at 19:20 | comment | added | Magisch | @Acccumulation Thats why you also have a higher minimum wage and strong labor unions for as many professions as possible - to prevent employers from passing the cost on. | |
Nov 6, 2017 at 18:18 | comment | added | Acccumulation | No, corporations pass the cost on with lower wages. The group that bear the cost is workers without children, who receive lower wages without the compensation. Your assertion that corporations and upper class have sole control over legislation is absurd. | |
Nov 6, 2017 at 16:30 | comment | added | Qsigma | +1 in countries (and in some US states) where working parents had a significant say in policy during the 20th century, for example through trades unions and social democratic parties (among others) a share of the burden moved towards employers. | |
Nov 6, 2017 at 15:39 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 6, 2017 at 15:42 | |||||
Nov 6, 2017 at 15:36 | history | answered | fallingfrog | CC BY-SA 3.0 |