Timeline for Freedom of speech and the N-word
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 3, 2019 at 12:27 | history | edited | Alexei |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 3, 2019 at 11:52 | answer | added | tj1000 | timeline score: -1 | |
Jul 1, 2019 at 19:28 | comment | added | Sidney | @PhilLello It should probably be noted in the context of the question "In Trouble" is not the same as "Sufficiently in trouble to be jailed" or even "In legal trouble". There is a taboo around the word, people don't like it and might treat you different if you use it, and private institutions can punish you in whatever legal matter they want, but you cannot be punished by the government. The controversy around Stephanie Bell of course is that she is a government employee and was punished by a government institution, that said, we put extra restrictions on teachers, so this isnt much different. | |
Jul 1, 2019 at 19:23 | answer | added | dolphin_of_france | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 7, 2016 at 12:59 | comment | added | Phil Lello | It's just very non-PC. Unrelated but similar words will also get you into trouble - en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/… gives an example of Stephanie Bell in trouble for apparently not changing her use of language based on the races present. | |
Apr 2, 2014 at 5:02 | vote | accept | Danil Gholtsman | ||
Apr 1, 2014 at 23:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPolitics/status/451132108883648512 | ||
Apr 1, 2014 at 21:47 | comment | added | Shahar | No, you can't get arrested for that. Check out: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions | |
Apr 1, 2014 at 21:13 | answer | added | NL7 | timeline score: 16 | |
Apr 1, 2014 at 20:06 | history | asked | Danil Gholtsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |