Skip to main content
added 369 characters in body
Source Link
user4012
  • 93.3k
  • 20
  • 228
  • 390

On a generic enough level, they fail because they:

  1. Aren't any better than non-moderates at fixing problems

  2. Are worse than non-moderates at selling the promise that they will fix problems

  3. Often, are part of "establishment" that people are dis-satisfied with due to problems - they either get blamed for the problems or for not having had fixed them.


Another factor is that "moderate" is a squishy vague term. One can argue that some of the new populist parties/leaders are true moderates and that the establishment parties went off "moderate" space some time ago and that is why they are being replaced as a choice. If you try to push the Overton window hard enough, you risk falling out of Overton window.

On a generic enough level, they fail because they:

  1. Aren't any better than non-moderates at fixing problems

  2. Are worse than non-moderates at selling the promise that they will fix problems

  3. Often, are part of "establishment" that people are dis-satisfied with due to problems - they either get blamed for the problems or for not having had fixed them.

On a generic enough level, they fail because they:

  1. Aren't any better than non-moderates at fixing problems

  2. Are worse than non-moderates at selling the promise that they will fix problems

  3. Often, are part of "establishment" that people are dis-satisfied with due to problems - they either get blamed for the problems or for not having had fixed them.


Another factor is that "moderate" is a squishy vague term. One can argue that some of the new populist parties/leaders are true moderates and that the establishment parties went off "moderate" space some time ago and that is why they are being replaced as a choice. If you try to push the Overton window hard enough, you risk falling out of Overton window.

Source Link
user4012
  • 93.3k
  • 20
  • 228
  • 390

On a generic enough level, they fail because they:

  1. Aren't any better than non-moderates at fixing problems

  2. Are worse than non-moderates at selling the promise that they will fix problems

  3. Often, are part of "establishment" that people are dis-satisfied with due to problems - they either get blamed for the problems or for not having had fixed them.