Timeline for Has there been a non-trivial, stable, and functional anarchy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14 at 3:04 | answer | added | Mozibur Ullah | timeline score: -2 | |
| Mar 23 at 17:59 | answer | added | Tai Q | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 28, 2023 at 19:39 | answer | added | Tyler Mc | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 2, 2022 at 6:38 | comment | added | benjimin | Is Freetown Christiania in Denmark too small? | |
| Oct 1, 2022 at 21:02 | answer | added | Tyler Mc | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 22, 2020 at 4:43 | answer | added | user29158 | timeline score: -2 | |
| Jul 9, 2018 at 10:18 | comment | added | Stian | @MarkRogers I am a cynic, I have to say we see it from widly different sides, heh. Not that you are wrong, I was just about to comment that there are many incentives (power, wealth, status) and many bad human traits (greed, dominance, vigilantism, religious idolatry) that certainly will degrade an anarchy to some sort of authoritarian regime quite quickly. | |
| S Jul 9, 2018 at 6:48 | history | suggested | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed unnecessary edit note
|
| Jul 9, 2018 at 5:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 9, 2018 at 6:48 | |||||
| Jul 8, 2018 at 13:35 | answer | added | TOOGAM | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 8, 2018 at 1:59 | answer | added | JoelSEnnis | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 7, 2018 at 21:48 | comment | added | user21424 | @JamesK Yeah, I've seen that movie. Spoilers, but... At the end, nearly everybody dies. | |
| Jul 7, 2018 at 21:46 | comment | added | James K | To clarify, in my answer I wrote of "high standards". What you mean by an "anarchy" is not what other people might mean. It might mean something more like Marxism. Anarchists of the 19th and early 20th century were not about a complete absence of law, but for a law written by and for the benefit of the proletariat. | |
| Jul 7, 2018 at 9:52 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1015534025769963521 | ||
| Jul 6, 2018 at 19:11 | answer | added | indigochild | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 15:58 | comment | added | Mark Rogers | Anarchies in modern times are never stable outside of warzones or intense poverty because there is usually many incentives (investments, protection of the physically weak, healthcare, commerce, etc) to form some kind of stable non-anarchistic government system . And the first people to do so are more likely to be on top of the new social structure. | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 14:49 | answer | added | ohwilleke♦ | timeline score: 51 | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 14:40 | answer | added | ChrisW | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 14:15 | answer | added | NecroTechno | timeline score: 27 | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 14:12 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 6, 2018 at 14:02 | history | edited | user21424 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1091 characters in body
|
| Jul 6, 2018 at 7:29 | answer | added | James K | timeline score: 58 | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 3:06 | history | asked | user21424 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |