Timeline for FISA warrants: why are the dates still redacted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2018 at 16:14 | comment | added | hszmv | Possibly because the specific date could point to the identity of a witness or reveal when the warrant was enacted and reveal what specific events were searched against. | |
| S Oct 17, 2018 at 8:16 | history | edited | JJJ♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected spelling or typo in redracted
|
| S Oct 17, 2018 at 8:16 | history | suggested | Burt_Harris | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected spelling or typo in redracted
|
| Oct 17, 2018 at 7:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 17, 2018 at 8:16 | |||||
| Oct 16, 2018 at 23:12 | history | edited | Brythan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Oct 16, 2018 at 22:13 | comment | added | Burt_Harris | Interesting, but not the date I'm referring to. At the very top of the fist page, it seems to be a timestamp when the clerk of the court received the application. It has been partially redacted, but the year and month remain. | |
| Oct 16, 2018 at 21:47 | history | answered | hszmv | CC BY-SA 4.0 |