Timeline for Why is a border wall such a polarising issue in American politics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 6, 2019 at 14:48 | history | edited | Jared Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 64 characters in body
|
Feb 18, 2019 at 13:05 | history | edited | Jared Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 352 characters in body
|
Feb 17, 2019 at 19:53 | history | bounty ended | user4012 | ||
S Jan 16, 2019 at 23:59 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
S Jan 16, 2019 at 23:59 | comment | added | Sam I am says Reinstate Monica | Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. | |
Jan 16, 2019 at 14:20 | history | edited | Jared Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 269 characters in body
|
Jan 13, 2019 at 20:08 | comment | added | Jared Smith | @JJJ sorry I wasn't more clear, but the point I was trying to make is that it's quasi-random. Why do some species thrive while others die out? You can say their more fit to the current environment, but that just pushes it back a step. What determines the environmental conditions? Politically this plays out as slight difference of opinion + tenuous connection to pre-existing narratives + feedback loop = something people in other countries make fun of you for. | |
Jan 13, 2019 at 1:10 | comment | added | JJJ♦ | This doesn't quite explain why this particular issue turned out so polarising. As you say, anything can become polarising but not everything does (to this extent). So why this issue? | |
Jan 13, 2019 at 0:39 | history | edited | Jared Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 96 characters in body
|
Jan 13, 2019 at 0:33 | history | answered | Jared Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |