Timeline for Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2019 at 19:16 | comment | added | phoog | @JonathanReez that is also a point well taken, but it does go beyond the literal scope of the question. And violations of the convention could be used as the basis for sanctions or similar consequences, even if it does not explicitly provide for them. Still, if the answer had been that Ecuador's action clearly violated international law, the logical next question is "what are the consequences," and the answer to that would be "probably none." | |
| Apr 11, 2019 at 18:58 | comment | added | JonathanReez | Finally it should be noted that there are no penalties for violating the 1951 refugee convention. Even if Ecuador did violate it, there's no one to sanction them for it. | |
| Apr 11, 2019 at 18:08 | history | edited | phoog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 211 characters in body
|
| Apr 11, 2019 at 17:50 | history | answered | phoog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |