Timeline for Comparative Environmental Policy/ Executive Orders
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019 at 3:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 1, 2019 at 13:56 | |||||
| Apr 16, 2019 at 15:30 | answer | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 16, 2019 at 15:19 | comment | added | David Gatzegoo Heckenberg | @Fizz because many executive orders that concern environmental issues do not contain either terms, as they are on topics such as agriculture or trade deals, I thought content analysis would help me categorise them as such. Thank you very much for the links! | |
| Apr 15, 2019 at 17:34 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | Here's a guide to content analysis mailman.columbia.edu/research/population-health-methods/… And a much more in-depth review paper on it pilotscholars.up.edu/cgi/… | |
| Apr 15, 2019 at 17:19 | answer | added | JJJ♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 15, 2019 at 17:07 | comment | added | JJJ♦ | I removed the emphasis on the content analysis part which wasn't added by the author. I think it's a good question as it requires more knowledge of the information that's available (which is political) than knowledge of how to do something like topic modelling (which might be even better suited for the datascience stack). | |
| Apr 15, 2019 at 17:02 | history | edited | JJJ♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removed emphasis on content analysis as that's more off-topic yet the emphasis on that was added by another editor
|
| Apr 15, 2019 at 16:30 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 15, 2019 at 17:02 | |||||
| Apr 15, 2019 at 16:17 | comment | added | divibisan | I think a question about analysis methods might be off-topic here, possibly a better fit for Cross Validated. A question about what kinds of issues count as environmental issues might be on-topic, but could possibly be too broad | |
| Apr 15, 2019 at 16:10 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | Why do you need to do it "without [...] specifically including the terms "environment", or "energy""? How do you think content analysis works? | |
| Apr 15, 2019 at 14:18 | history | edited | Alexei | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed useless content + minor formatting
|
| Apr 15, 2019 at 13:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 15, 2019 at 14:19 | |||||
| Apr 15, 2019 at 13:50 | history | asked | David Gatzegoo Heckenberg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |