Timeline for What are the arguments for California’s nonpartisan blanket (jungle) primaries?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 12, 2019 at 18:47 | vote | accept | Stormblessed | ||
Jul 16, 2019 at 12:26 | comment | added | kuhl | So essentially, the Republicans don't get an elected official with an (R) next to their name, but they do get a more conservative candidate than they would have in a standard 2 party primary. | |
Jul 15, 2019 at 23:12 | comment | added | Stephen | It seems to be as close as the US gets to preferential elections. | |
Jul 15, 2019 at 22:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Jul 15, 2019 at 23:48 | |||||
Jul 15, 2019 at 20:44 | history | edited | T.E.D. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor grammar cleanup. Fix a "Democrat Party"
|
Jul 15, 2019 at 17:34 | history | edited | divibisan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Split up the first paragraph and bolded a key point that was hidden inside a big block to text. Clarified that it is the republicans' supporters who give the centrist democrat victory in the example
|
Jul 15, 2019 at 16:12 | comment | added | deep64blue | "the Centrist candidate wins because he gets the support of the two republican candidates" you mean voters, candidates might endorse someone of course! | |
Jul 15, 2019 at 15:50 | history | edited | Winston Ewert | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
S Jul 15, 2019 at 15:49 | history | suggested | Chieron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
spelling/grammar corrections. updated formatting
|
Jul 15, 2019 at 15:40 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 15, 2019 at 15:49 | |||||
Jul 15, 2019 at 0:15 | comment | added | Stormblessed | Oh! That's interesting, I'd been starting to think it was only for increasing Democrat power, but that is nice that the minority party has more power if they are totally in no way going to have a chance of winning. | |
Jul 14, 2019 at 23:38 | history | answered | Winston Ewert | CC BY-SA 4.0 |