Timeline for Was the whistleblower in the Ukraine scandal legally required to make his report?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2019 at 16:02 | vote | accept | Burt | ||
| Oct 6, 2019 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1180860388243578880 | ||
| Oct 4, 2019 at 3:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 4, 2019 at 5:15 | |||||
| Sep 28, 2019 at 12:33 | comment | added | emory | @Barmar I agree it is probable that the whistleblower is a US federal government employee. | |
| Sep 28, 2019 at 12:32 | comment | added | Barmar | @emory The complaint says that he learned of the information in the course of his official duties. It's hard to imagine how that could be true of someone who doesn't work for the government, although I suppose it could be a government contractor. | |
| Sep 28, 2019 at 12:29 | comment | added | emory | @Barmar I think we could answer the question if we knew their general role in the government but not their specific identity. All I know is that the whistle blower used a channel available to government employees - which suggests but does not imply a government employee. | |
| Sep 27, 2019 at 22:47 | comment | added | Barmar | @emory Why would you need to know who they are? It might be necessary to know their general role in the government, but not their specific identity. | |
| Sep 27, 2019 at 17:28 | comment | added | emory | I think that in general we can not answer this question because we do not know who the whistle blower is. | |
| Sep 27, 2019 at 6:05 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Sep 26, 2019 at 23:39 | history | edited | grovkin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
slightly fixed up grammar and usage
|
| Sep 26, 2019 at 23:24 | answer | added | Rick Smith | timeline score: 22 | |
| Sep 26, 2019 at 23:16 | comment | added | grovkin | I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's clearly a question about law rather than the process of governing. It belongs on law.SE much more than it does on politics.SE. | |
| Sep 26, 2019 at 22:53 | answer | added | CrackpotCrocodile | timeline score: 19 | |
| Sep 26, 2019 at 22:45 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 26, 2019 at 23:39 | |||||
| Sep 26, 2019 at 22:40 | history | edited | 264 champagne bottles on ice |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 26, 2019 at 22:29 | history | edited | divibisan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Changed the title to be more descriptive
|
| Sep 26, 2019 at 22:28 | history | edited | Joe C | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edited out section that asked about internal motivations
|
| Sep 26, 2019 at 22:16 | history | edited | Burt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 145 characters in body
|
| Sep 26, 2019 at 22:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 26, 2019 at 23:25 | |||||
| Sep 26, 2019 at 22:06 | history | edited | Rick Smith |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 26, 2019 at 22:05 | history | asked | Burt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |