Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 12, 2020 at 16:16 history edited agc CC BY-SA 4.0
Typo.
Mar 10, 2020 at 17:17 answer added Ted Wrigley timeline score: 3
Mar 10, 2020 at 17:17 answer added SCFi timeline score: 5
Mar 10, 2020 at 15:39 comment added SCFi @puppetsock anything brought for an official vote/attempting to get passed I'd count
Mar 10, 2020 at 15:08 comment added puppetsock Would Bloomberg's attempts to restrict soda cup size count?
Mar 10, 2020 at 14:47 comment added Philipp @SCFi In my experience, adding arguments to a question usually achieves the opposite effect: Provoking those who disagree with the implied political demand to dig out their counter-arguments and start a lenghty comment debate which quickly turns dirty.
Mar 10, 2020 at 14:45 comment added SCFi @Philipp that's fine it's more so to remove any comments of people that would ask why it should be regulated and may have an adverse reaction. Thus the preamble on my view and why I am asking to dissuade negative feedback. But let's see how it goes
Mar 10, 2020 at 14:43 comment added Philipp As you should know, the purpose of Politics Stack Exchange is not to convince others of our opinions. About 80% of this question was just used to convince the reader that sugar is bad. But that's not really relevant to the political question whether or not there are notable attempts at regulating sugar, unless the actual goal of the question were to convince the audience that it should be. I therefore removed most of this question in order to focus it on the actual political question we can answer.
Mar 10, 2020 at 14:43 history edited Philipp CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 735 characters in body; edited tags
Mar 10, 2020 at 14:25 history edited SCFi CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Mar 10, 2020 at 14:22 comment added Alexei Somewhat related politics.stackexchange.com/questions/31411/…
Mar 10, 2020 at 14:19 history asked SCFi CC BY-SA 4.0