Timeline for What long-term options do politicians have for Covid-19 and what are their implications? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2020 at 19:17 | history | closed |
Relaxed JJJ♦ Mithridates the Great Martin Schröder Jontia |
Needs more focus | |
| Apr 14, 2020 at 13:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 14, 2020 at 19:17 | |||||
| Apr 14, 2020 at 13:20 | comment | added | Relaxed | (-1) This question is a hot mess. After declaring (in your answer to the other question) that we know nothing and there could be no plan (which is plainly not true), you realize it is in fact possible but want to engage in armchair speculation based on a single article you happened to like. Obviously, not publishing a (new) plan doesn't mean there is no strategy either. | |
| Apr 14, 2020 at 2:17 | answer | added | Italian Philosopher | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 13, 2020 at 22:35 | answer | added | dandavis | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 13, 2020 at 10:50 | answer | added | user29223 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 13, 2020 at 9:46 | history | edited | Alexei |
added health related tags
|
|
| Apr 13, 2020 at 9:46 | history | reopened |
JonathanReez user25526 Denis de Bernardy SurpriseDog Alexei |
||
| Apr 13, 2020 at 8:31 | comment | added | Manziel | Actually, I found the medium article only while researching for English sources. But do with this question what you want. I already see that this obviously did not hit the personal agenda of some people and I am a bit disappointed that discussion about the question only started after people started to vote to reopen. | |
| Apr 13, 2020 at 6:58 | comment | added | agc | The phrase "plausible long-term scenarios" is much more general than "long-term options ... politicians have". The latter usage suggests the possibility that long-term careerist politicians might avoid some sound public remedy that might endanger their personal long-term career -- as with a pol callously rejecting a better public health option in favor of any mediocre option that best rewarded their favorite lobbyist. Please clarify. | |
| Apr 13, 2020 at 5:22 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | And yeah, one can obviously post other answers when the question is reopened (which looks like it's going to happen), but frankly the question is pretty broad. And how would one decide which answers are good to a question like this, i.e. "what options to they have"? It seems to me (self-answer aside) the question is inviting a popularity contest of proposed solutions to Covid-19. (See for example Johnathan's answer and the downvotes it has. The answer is technically on-topic, for some meaning of "option on the table", but sure it was DV because users here disagree with those proposal(s).) | |
| Apr 13, 2020 at 5:12 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | I'm somewhat unhappy with this question-answer because it was apparently written to promote a specific Medium article, proposing a specific "hammer and dance" paradigm, which isn't even analyzed very scientifically in the original source. To adapt a certain phrase "beware of the [self-posted] answer based a single [popsci] article about [solutions to] Covid-19". | |
| Apr 12, 2020 at 23:15 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 13, 2020 at 9:46 | |||||
| Apr 12, 2020 at 22:57 | history | closed |
264 champagne bottles on ice Drunk Cynic jeffronicus Be Brave Be Like Ukraine Vikki |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Apr 12, 2020 at 21:20 | answer | added | JonathanReez | timeline score: -2 | |
| Apr 12, 2020 at 18:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 12, 2020 at 22:57 | |||||
| S Apr 12, 2020 at 14:44 | answer | added | Manziel | timeline score: 4 | |
| S Apr 12, 2020 at 14:44 | history | asked | Manziel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |