Timeline for What are the conclusions of the leaked Labour antisemitism report?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2020 at 12:42 | comment | added | Valorum | @davidbak - Indeed. In this case it appears that the report's authors have selectively quoted individuals to try to build a case that the party leadership were hampered by in-fighting and factionalism from incompetent and malicious staffers and the deputy-leadership and that basically Corbyn and his people were doing their best under difficult circumstances. | |
| Apr 14, 2020 at 15:37 | comment | added | davidbak | As an internal investigation of a political party there is no reason to believe that any argument within the body of the document is reported without spin to make things as favorable for the party as possible, and also no reason to believe any conclusion reached (or promises made for the future!) have any relationship to reality. I'm not just saying this about the British Labour party - but about most internal investigations of any organization and of political parties in particular. | |
| Apr 14, 2020 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1249985885581578240 | ||
| Apr 14, 2020 at 5:26 | vote | accept | CDJB♦ | ||
| Apr 14, 2020 at 3:55 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 13, 2020 at 21:29 | answer | added | James K | timeline score: 38 | |
| Apr 13, 2020 at 21:11 | comment | added | CDJB♦ | @AndrewGrimm Because after it was compiled, the party's lawyers told the party it should not be sent to the EHRC as it would damage their case (source). It is very unlikely that it will be published officially. | |
| Apr 13, 2020 at 21:07 | comment | added | Golden Cuy | Why not wait for the conclusions of the officially published report? | |
| Apr 13, 2020 at 19:52 | history | asked | CDJB♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |