Timeline for What is the relationship between communism and 'a classless system'?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2023 at 12:28 | comment | added | eyeballfrog | @user253751 I'm confused as to what value they did not generate that they're pocketing from me. Do you mean through any maintenance such as cleaning that I do myself? | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 7:41 | comment | added | M i ech | @eyeballfrog No, it's the tradesmen contracted for repairs who create value. | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 6:42 | comment | added | eyeballfrog | Doesn't a landlord provide value through various forms of building maintenance? | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 9:01 | comment | added | Zeus | "The rich" or "the 1%" is not really the point. They might even work. The biggest distinction is being the hired labour (proletariat) and the hirer of labour ('the exploitator'). A struggling small shop owner may be poorer than a skilled worker, but is still a 'bourgeoisie' and must be eliminated. | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 2:45 | comment | added | user33085 | "there are only two classes: "bourgeoisie" and "proletariat"." That is true only for capitalism. In general it is false (read the Manifesto). | |
| Aug 3, 2020 at 1:33 | history | answered | M i ech | CC BY-SA 4.0 |