Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 24 at 9:50 history protected CDJB
Oct 9, 2020 at 19:56 history edited divibisan
edited tags
Oct 3, 2020 at 21:43 comment added Robbie Goodwin If the Army sometimes interfering is not a problem for you, can you say where and why you'd like to draw the line? Why would it matter if the Army simply took over everything? There are two kinds of army interference, one being when a bunch of power-hungry hot-shots basically steal the country. Is that what you're describing? The other - prolly more rare - is when a bunch of properly-motivated people with real power tell bad politicians to stop messing about and run the country properly. Is that it?
Oct 1, 2020 at 1:03 answer added user366312 timeline score: -4
Oct 1, 2020 at 0:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1311455867431260161
Sep 30, 2020 at 14:02 history became hot network question
Sep 30, 2020 at 10:54 answer added Paul Johnson timeline score: 25
Sep 30, 2020 at 9:38 vote accept Dear Comrade
Sep 30, 2020 at 9:37 history edited Dear Comrade
edited tags
Sep 30, 2020 at 9:18 comment added Thomas Koelle @DearComrade read my comment again, I gave theoretical examples. You need to give sources for your claim before someone can give sources to good answers.
Sep 30, 2020 at 9:09 comment added Dear Comrade @ThomasKoelle - within Pakistan wants to strengthen Imran Khan, why? this is where they are going wrong. The person/population opposite to Imran is not important for army?
Sep 30, 2020 at 9:03 comment added Thomas Koelle @DearComrade this is just examples. Maybe the agenda of someone from India is to weaken the army, the agenda of Europeans is they don't understand how necessary it can be to have an army to secure against extreme religious powers in the region and those within Pakistan wants to strengthen Imran Khan. So, in the question, it is important to give examples because there are different answers.
Sep 30, 2020 at 8:53 comment added Thomas Koelle Could you maybe give examples of who the people that says it? E.g. it would differ greatly in the answer if the people are from Europe, India or within Pakistan itself.
Sep 30, 2020 at 7:07 answer added Italian Philosopher timeline score: 38
Sep 30, 2020 at 6:14 comment added yeah22 Yes, the government should be made by the people, but how can that be done if the army is interfering?
Sep 30, 2020 at 6:13 comment added Dear Comrade @yeah22 - As they claim Pakistan constitutional is a democratic and govt made by people. Thats why I added the tag
S Sep 30, 2020 at 6:11 history suggested yeah22 CC BY-SA 4.0
corrected grammar
Sep 30, 2020 at 6:10 review Suggested edits
S Sep 30, 2020 at 6:11
Sep 30, 2020 at 6:08 comment added yeah22 You have the tag "democracy" on your question. How can a country be a democracy if all the decisions are made by the army and not the people?
Sep 30, 2020 at 5:51 review First posts
Sep 30, 2020 at 6:08
Sep 30, 2020 at 5:50 history asked Dear Comrade CC BY-SA 4.0