Skip to main content
31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 30, 2020 at 14:33 answer added Philip timeline score: -2
S Oct 27, 2020 at 20:01 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 4.0
proper capitalization
Oct 27, 2020 at 19:53 review Suggested edits
S Oct 27, 2020 at 20:01
Oct 27, 2020 at 6:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1320968492028493825
Oct 25, 2020 at 3:07 review Close votes
Oct 25, 2020 at 12:44
Oct 20, 2020 at 23:16 comment added smci A more neutral rewrite could be "What are the main arguments to Barrett's SC nomination?" Some of these are procedural, just about the timeline of the nomination itself, some link to quid-pro-quo expectations that she will rule a certain way on ACA/ voting rights/ 2020 election/ census/ gerrymandering etc., some are about her stated/inferred attitudes/ bias/ neutrality, some about her judicial record esp. on social, reproductive, gun etc. issues. Some people aren't objecting, and some are mixed, so "Why are [some] people[/groups] protesting..." kind of misstates things.
Oct 20, 2020 at 19:14 history edited Italian Philosopher CC BY-SA 4.0
changed the link to just point to her Wikipedia entry rather than an interpretation of the current events
Oct 20, 2020 at 13:17 answer added bendl timeline score: 12
Oct 20, 2020 at 4:09 answer added Joe timeline score: 14
Oct 20, 2020 at 1:24 answer added reirab timeline score: 29
Oct 19, 2020 at 20:18 answer added user3165 timeline score: 9
Oct 19, 2020 at 16:45 comment added Paul Johnson To all commenters on this question and its answers: saying "people are protesting because X" is not an assertion that X is correct. The question is asking why people are protesting, so if someone has said "I'm protesting because X" then that is a valid answer to this question.
Oct 19, 2020 at 8:07 answer added user20338 timeline score: 23
Oct 19, 2020 at 6:26 history became hot network question
Oct 18, 2020 at 20:43 review Close votes
Oct 19, 2020 at 2:58
Oct 18, 2020 at 20:13 comment added Italian Philosopher The downvotes seem to assume this is a push question. However, if you step back and treat it as a hypothetical Martian looking at the subject matter, it does seem like a lot of protesting going on about something that might be considered fairly pedestrian out of a US context. I am not saying a SCOTUS nomination, and especially not this one, is pedestrian, only that a person naive wrt to US politics might think it so. The OP's posting history here has little, if any, US content.
Oct 18, 2020 at 17:28 answer added Be Brave Be Like Ukraine timeline score: 45
Oct 18, 2020 at 13:18 history reopened JJJ
Oct 18, 2020 at 13:18 history edited JJJ CC BY-SA 4.0
added 86 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Oct 18, 2020 at 12:59 comment added JJJ Comments moved to chat. Please don't use comments to debate the question matter. If you would like to answer, please (reopen and) post a real answer. If you would like to discuss, please use the chat function. Please try to limit these comments to suggesting improvements to the question.
S Oct 18, 2020 at 12:58 history mod moved comments to chat
S Oct 18, 2020 at 12:58 comment added JJJ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
Oct 18, 2020 at 12:45 vote accept Severus Snape
Oct 18, 2020 at 12:11 history closed David Hammen
Jontia
Be Brave Be Like Ukraine
Martin Schröder
Severus Snape
Opinion-based
Oct 18, 2020 at 10:11 history edited Severus Snape CC BY-SA 4.0
Removed few sentences
Oct 18, 2020 at 9:27 history edited Severus Snape CC BY-SA 4.0
added 14 characters in body
Oct 18, 2020 at 9:24 history rollback Severus Snape
Rollback to Revision 1
Oct 18, 2020 at 9:19 history edited F1Krazy CC BY-SA 4.0
added 14 characters in body
Oct 18, 2020 at 8:40 review Close votes
Oct 18, 2020 at 12:16
Oct 18, 2020 at 8:30 answer added tim timeline score: 106
Oct 18, 2020 at 7:54 history asked Severus Snape CC BY-SA 4.0