Timeline for Why am I being asked to vote?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 22, 2020 at 16:23 | comment | added | yeah22 | @bendl OK -- I've replaced "fake" with "dubiously obtained". | |
Oct 22, 2020 at 16:23 | history | edited | yeah22 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 55 characters in body
|
Oct 21, 2020 at 19:26 | comment | added | bendl | @yeah22 I didn't actually intend that you should remove the section, only clarify that there was probably some sort of fraud, just not likely fake votes. Voter harvesting is still illegal in most places, but there is a perception that faking a vote is much easier than it is. | |
Oct 21, 2020 at 19:23 | comment | added | bendl | @StefanSkoglund as far as I'm aware no such law exists in the States... | |
Oct 21, 2020 at 2:20 | history | edited | yeah22 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 41 characters in body
|
Oct 21, 2020 at 2:20 | comment | added | yeah22 | @bendl Hm, alright. I'll remove that part | |
Oct 20, 2020 at 20:44 | comment | added | Stefan Skoglund | @bendl many countries (most) has a requirements on voter turnout for such an referendum for the result to be accredited. 400 votes from a group of 5000 ? That is with those rules basically not eligible and so would be unimplementable or a target of litigation. | |
Oct 20, 2020 at 14:53 | comment | added | bendl | I'd like to point out on the point of Bell, California, on the subject of "Fake" votes, I haven't seen any evidence in my quick search that the ballots were actually fake. Harvested, almost certainly, but at the present moment in politics, I think pretty great care should be taken on the subject of fake ballots. More than likely as I see it, those people did intend to vote for the measure they voted for. | |
Oct 20, 2020 at 1:02 | history | answered | yeah22 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |