Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1340763919925829639
added 192 characters in body
Source Link
user366312
  • 19k
  • 7
  • 64
  • 141

Purchasing Russian missiles have risks of inviting US sanctions.

Since India is officially a US ally, Why is India purchasing S-400 rather than the US-made missiles (Patriot or David's Sling or THAAD)?

If tech-transfer was the issue, S-400 doesn't come with a tech-transfer. Patriot and THAAD may also deny tech-transfer. In that case, Israel's David's Sling might have been a better option.


P.S. My personal opinion is, India was probably trying to (1) avoid lengthy negotiation, (2) engage Russia with defense deals so that they don't lean or sell arms to Pakistan.

Purchasing Russian missiles have risks of inviting US sanctions.

Since India is officially a US ally, Why is India purchasing S-400 rather than the US-made missiles (Patriot or David's Sling or THAAD)?

Purchasing Russian missiles have risks of inviting US sanctions.

Since India is officially a US ally, Why is India purchasing S-400 rather than the US-made missiles (Patriot or David's Sling or THAAD)?

If tech-transfer was the issue, S-400 doesn't come with a tech-transfer. Patriot and THAAD may also deny tech-transfer. In that case, Israel's David's Sling might have been a better option.


P.S. My personal opinion is, India was probably trying to (1) avoid lengthy negotiation, (2) engage Russia with defense deals so that they don't lean or sell arms to Pakistan.

edited tags
Link
divibisan
  • 26k
  • 6
  • 112
  • 135
added 66 characters in body
Source Link
user366312
  • 19k
  • 7
  • 64
  • 141
Loading
Source Link
user366312
  • 19k
  • 7
  • 64
  • 141
Loading