Timeline for Why don't the UK and EU agree to fish only in their territorial waters?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2021 at 9:55 | comment | added | Relaxed | @JonathanReez Not necessarily most fish but at least a large enough quantity of fish (for some species, at a key point in their lifecycle) to matter. My main point is larger though: It will be a huge disruption because the industry evolved that way over a long time. | |
| Jan 3, 2021 at 0:22 | comment | added | JonathanReez | "but at the end of the day retreating to the EU's territorial waters (or its EEZ) will create a huge disruption and devastate an entire industry." => is this because most fish comes from the UK EEZ? | |
| Dec 21, 2020 at 9:30 | history | edited | Relaxed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Dec 21, 2020 at 9:28 | comment | added | Relaxed | @Jontia Yes, probably, I added it, thanks. But I guess my point is that the EU stands to lose a lot in this area and would try to get some cash/compensation and long sunset period no matter how convincing this or that argument seems to people on either side. If the EU didn't have solid arguments based on quota purchases, ressource management, or market access for fish, it would just invent bad ones and push for some compensation anyway, even if that means grasping at straws. | |
| Dec 21, 2020 at 9:22 | history | edited | Relaxed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Dec 21, 2020 at 9:19 | comment | added | Jontia | You probably need "quota sales/purchases" in that list of arguments. It seems a fairly key one, although one that could be solved by liberal applications of cash if the UK were so inclined. | |
| Dec 21, 2020 at 1:27 | history | edited | Relaxed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 21, 2020 at 1:19 | history | edited | Relaxed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 130 characters in body
|
| Dec 20, 2020 at 23:54 | history | answered | Relaxed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |