Timeline for Why not give representatives as many votes as they received in the election?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2018 at 16:52 | answer | added | Iota | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 5, 2018 at 20:52 | comment | added | endolith | Liquid/Delegative democracy is somewhat similar, where you delegate your vote to a representative, and they now have your voting power. | |
| Jun 5, 2017 at 20:39 | comment | added | PoloHoleSet | Since we'd have an increase in number of elected representatives to reflect the will of all the constituencies no longer losing out by "winner take all," how would the salaries of those people be allocated? How about budgets for staff and operational resources? I'm not a small-government conservative or any kind of libertarian, but I'd think there would have to be an explosion in the population of elected members and and the size of the bureaucracy of the legislative branch. | |
| Jun 5, 2017 at 2:48 | history | edited | Brythan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2017 at 19:07 | history | edited | user11249 |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 3, 2014 at 23:40 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPolitics/status/529417930211999745 | ||
| Nov 2, 2014 at 4:07 | answer | added | DJohnM | timeline score: -1 | |
| Oct 30, 2014 at 9:15 | answer | added | Relaxed | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 22:06 | history | edited | jim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add mention of gerrymandering
|
| Oct 28, 2014 at 22:00 | answer | added | LateralFractal | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 28, 2014 at 13:54 | answer | added | lazarusL | timeline score: 12 | |
| Oct 28, 2014 at 10:26 | history | asked | jim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |