Timeline for Why does Zelenskyy urge NATO to impose a no-fly zone?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2022 at 15:58 | comment | added | r13 | I disagree. Energy supply and uses can't be switched on and off quickly without the suffering of the people and their economy that rely/depend on it. Your answer implies Ukraine willingly allows Russian oil continues to flow to EU through its land, it is true for 2 thinkable reasons: 1) Before the war, Ukrain is willingly to accept it as the pipeline can be a deterrent for invasion from Russia, and it benefits all parties involved. 2) Since the invasion, Ukrain elected not to blow it up so not to cause severe disturbance on EU countries, thus causing EU to turn its heads against Ukraine. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 5:46 | comment | added | o.m. | @r13, the EU would have to go to other sources and/or use their storage reserves. Percentages differ, Germany uses half Russian gas, some smaller countries closer to 100%. The storage is almost empty after the winter, but that is normal after a winter. The real crunch would come next winter. It could mean shutting some energy-intensive industries down. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 4:29 | comment | added | uberhaxed | @r13 Russia is building Nord Stream 2 specifically to bypass Ukraine. Which is opposed by Ukraine for obvious reasons. | |
| Mar 20, 2022 at 23:51 | comment | added | r13 | "They demand that an end to buying Russian gas while gas is pumped through Ukraine.". I don't know how true is this statement but wondering 1) what will happens to EU if the pipeline is cut off by Ukrain, and 2) if the pipeline is significant, why Russia takes the risk to bomb the region, or they have found ways to avoid the collateral damage to the pipeline? | |
| Mar 20, 2022 at 20:53 | history | edited | o.m. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2022 at 20:38 | history | answered | o.m. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |