Timeline for Are there benefits, except moral support for the victim country, to approach the ICJ when the offender is a UNSC Permanent member?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2023 at 16:13 | history | edited | Italian Philosopher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Mar 29, 2023 at 16:00 | history | edited | Italian Philosopher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 692 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2022 at 8:43 | comment | added | Rekesoft | Not that I disagree with this comment, but you should have add a TL;DR section saying to the OP "you are right". Reputational costs and soft power do exist, but they are indeed soft. No country in the world stopped doing bussiness with the USA because of that ruling; not even the Ukraine war has prevented Germany to keep buying russian gas. Loss of reputation by the US is a thing, nearly no non-western country has rallied behind the US flag in joining sanctions against Russia - they may have comdenmed the invasion at the UN voting, but nothing else - but it's quite pointless. | |
| Mar 26, 2022 at 19:18 | history | edited | Italian Philosopher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 277 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2022 at 19:08 | history | edited | Italian Philosopher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 286 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2022 at 19:02 | history | answered | Italian Philosopher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |