Timeline for Why is Austria's foreign minister explicitly not supporting Ukraine's full membership in the European Union?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3 at 12:14 | answer | added | demokrator | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 26, 2023 at 19:14 | answer | added | Stančikas | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 26, 2023 at 18:41 | history | protected | Alexei | ||
| Dec 26, 2023 at 18:12 | answer | added | user48469 | timeline score: -2 | |
| Jun 30, 2023 at 17:58 | answer | added | user46787 | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 2, 2022 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1521051870147616769 | ||
| Apr 28, 2022 at 7:26 | vote | accept | Alexei | ||
| Apr 26, 2022 at 14:38 | answer | added | Timur Shtatland | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 26, 2022 at 12:12 | answer | added | convert | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 25, 2022 at 17:02 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 26, 2022 at 10:10 | |||||
| Apr 25, 2022 at 6:06 | comment | added | o.m. | He might also be saying loud what others are just thinking -- that Ukraine is publicly treating anything less than unconditional, unlimited support as a hostile act. There are other wars, other disasters on the globe, they don't come with a fast lane to structural cohesion funds, common agricultural policy, and the Four Freedoms of the Single Market. | |
| Apr 25, 2022 at 5:02 | comment | added | QuantumWalnut | We don't have full context of the statement. It would be better if there is a transcript or video to determine what the Austrian foreign minister is saying. Based on our limited information, it could be just an off-the-cuff comment on how he would "prefer" the situation to be handled, rather than that being Austrian govenrment's official position. | |
| Apr 25, 2022 at 4:31 | answer | added | o.m. | timeline score: 9 | |
| Apr 24, 2022 at 20:45 | comment | added | xngtng | Also, the context is the decision of EU executives this June, not forever into the future, on Ukraine becoming a candidate. There is no "unity of the message" on this front. Countries will take a position after June one way or another. An official EU candidate would already imply pre-accession financial help, and sure it is mostly symbolic, but symbolism matters, especially when there are other candidate countries that either expect similar treatment to Ukraine or Ukraine may be expecting similar treatment to them. | |
| Apr 24, 2022 at 20:41 | comment | added | xngtng | "As for why Ukraine shouldn't receive EU candidate status this June, Schallenberg pointed to states in the Western Balkans that are currently joining talks for EU accession." | |
| Apr 24, 2022 at 20:20 | comment | added | Alexei | @Trilarion I have managed to find a source that mentions the context for the statement. The context seems to be an official one, so I guess it is not a personal opinion, but rather in his official capacity. | |
| Apr 24, 2022 at 20:14 | history | edited | Alexei | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarified the title of the person with the statement + added another source
|
| Apr 24, 2022 at 19:32 | history | edited | NoDataDumpNoContribution | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
adapted title to match body better, if he spoke in official capacity, it should be changed back
|
| Apr 24, 2022 at 19:31 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | Is FM foreign minister? Also did he make this statement in his official capacity or just as a private opinion? The title asks about Austria but the statement might well only be valid for a single Austrian. There are approximately 9 million more Austrians and surely some of them will not support the full membership of Ukraine but many others will. | |
| Apr 24, 2022 at 19:23 | history | edited | Rick Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body; edited title
|
| Apr 24, 2022 at 19:18 | history | asked | Alexei | CC BY-SA 4.0 |