Skip to main content
Politics

Return to Question

Tweeted twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1547143811335426053
added link supporting UN linkage since some EUFOR communications and wikipedia did not really indicate that though it was mentioned in Al Jazeera article.
Source Link
Italian Philosopher
Italian Philosopher
  • 92.7k
  • 12
  • 214
  • 372

There has been speculation that Russia may veto an extension of the EUFOR mandate, which despite its name is apparently operating under a UNSC resolutionapparently operating under a UNSC resolution.

Assuming that veto happens (and given the hardened stance of Russia on UN aid in Syria, it might), does the Republika Srpska (led by "ultranationalist" Dodik) have a legal basis to demand that foreign troops leave all of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including the Muslim-Croat federation that's "the other half" of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Basically, does the constitution of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina give Republika Srpska a veto on foreign troop deployments anywhere in the the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

There has been speculation that Russia may veto an extension of the EUFOR mandate, which despite its name is apparently operating under a UNSC resolution.

Assuming that veto happens (and given the hardened stance of Russia on UN aid in Syria, it might), does the Republika Srpska (led by "ultranationalist" Dodik) have a legal basis to demand that foreign troops leave all of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including the Muslim-Croat federation that's "the other half" of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Basically, does the constitution of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina give Republika Srpska a veto on foreign troop deployments anywhere in the the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

There has been speculation that Russia may veto an extension of the EUFOR mandate, which despite its name is apparently operating under a UNSC resolution.

Assuming that veto happens (and given the hardened stance of Russia on UN aid in Syria, it might), does the Republika Srpska (led by "ultranationalist" Dodik) have a legal basis to demand that foreign troops leave all of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including the Muslim-Croat federation that's "the other half" of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Basically, does the constitution of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina give Republika Srpska a veto on foreign troop deployments anywhere in the the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Became Hot Network Question
added 194 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
264 champagne bottles on ice
264 champagne bottles on ice
  • 180.6k
  • 30
  • 431
  • 915

There has been speculation that Russia may veto an extension of the EUFOR mandate, which despite its name is apparently operating under a UNSC resolution.

Assuming that veto happens (and given the hardened stance of Russia on UN aid in Syria, it might), does the Republika Srpska (led by "ultranationalist" Dodik) have a legal basis to demand that foreign troops leave all of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including the Muslim-Croat federation that's "the other half" of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Basically, does the constitution of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina give Republika Srpska a veto on foreign troop deployments anywhere in the the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

There has been speculation that Russia may veto an extension of the EUFOR mandate, which despite its name is apparently operating under a UNSC resolution.

Assuming that veto happens (and given the hardened stance of Russia on UN aid in Syria, it might), does the Republika Srpska (led by "ultranationalist" Dodik) have a legal basis to demand that foreign troops leave all of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including the Muslim-Croat federation that's "the other half" of the Republic of of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

There has been speculation that Russia may veto an extension of the EUFOR mandate, which despite its name is apparently operating under a UNSC resolution.

Assuming that veto happens (and given the hardened stance of Russia on UN aid in Syria, it might), does the Republika Srpska (led by "ultranationalist" Dodik) have a legal basis to demand that foreign troops leave all of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including the Muslim-Croat federation that's "the other half" of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Basically, does the constitution of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina give Republika Srpska a veto on foreign troop deployments anywhere in the the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Source Link
264 champagne bottles on ice
264 champagne bottles on ice
  • 180.6k
  • 30
  • 431
  • 915

Assuming Russia vetoes EUFOR mandate extension in Bosnia, can Dodik legally "kick out" all EUFOR troops, including from the Croat-Muslim federation?

There has been speculation that Russia may veto an extension of the EUFOR mandate, which despite its name is apparently operating under a UNSC resolution.

Assuming that veto happens (and given the hardened stance of Russia on UN aid in Syria, it might), does the Republika Srpska (led by "ultranationalist" Dodik) have a legal basis to demand that foreign troops leave all of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including the Muslim-Croat federation that's "the other half" of the Republic of of Bosnia and Herzegovina?