Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 11, 2022 at 7:26 history edited gerrit CC BY-SA 4.0
added 8 characters in body
Aug 11, 2022 at 7:26 comment added gerrit @RadovanGarabík I see. I suspect that they would have informed the Iraqi government in advance if they trusted them, and if they didn't trust them, then maybe they're not so friendly after all. Or they did send a cable "btw, we're about to kill your guest in a moment, please don't intervene". Yes, I admit this is a circular "no true Scotsman" reasoning…
Aug 4, 2022 at 11:57 comment added Radovan Garabík "They [US government] won't commit drone strikes on friendly countries without coordination" - they would and they did. See Qasem Soleimani; note that Irak has been (at least nominally) a US ally at the time.
Aug 3, 2022 at 14:29 comment added gerrit @AnshulSahni That is a different question, and possibly subjective.
Aug 3, 2022 at 14:25 comment added Anshul Sahni The United States already has a lot of enmity with different groups present on Afghan Soil, breaking the agreement with the largest militant group of the region that happens to also practically control the whole country, isn't that a foolish step, to compromise the security of its own citizens both inside & outside the US?
S Aug 3, 2022 at 14:05 history suggested RonJohn CC BY-SA 4.0
Added additional countries they won't strike.
Aug 3, 2022 at 13:14 review Suggested edits
S Aug 3, 2022 at 14:05
Aug 3, 2022 at 12:45 comment added gerrit @AnshulSahni Agreements stand useless if parties decide to ignore the agreement.
Aug 3, 2022 at 11:43 comment added Anshul Sahni So you mean that Doha Agreement in practicality stands useless once the last soldier or last citizen left Afghan soil?
Aug 3, 2022 at 10:51 history answered gerrit CC BY-SA 4.0