Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 28, 2023 at 10:15 history edited phoog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 873 characters in body
Aug 19, 2022 at 13:22 comment added henning no longer feeds AI Trump et al. might have made digital copies - who knows. But if they indeed made digital copies, they weren't caught.
Aug 18, 2022 at 1:03 comment added Alexander The 1st @Barmar: On top of what Hobbamok said - removing the paper copies of the originals makes it harder for them to make copies without using the copies they made to make those copies. Knowing who has the original documents means you know who is liable for the other copies, if they are made.
Aug 17, 2022 at 11:24 comment added Hobbamok @Barmar you are on a completely wrong train of thought. This investigation is not about could-have-happeneds in the past. It is about gathering evidence that a crime was committed, so that the central factor in real or potential breaches (the persons doing it) can be kept away from future material. The current material is more or less considered breached. But with this trial (based on this evidence) future breaches of future material could be prevented
Aug 16, 2022 at 13:22 comment added phoog @Barmar we don't know that they didn't make copies. But we do know that they didn't make copies, shred the originals, and burn the remains.
Aug 16, 2022 at 13:17 comment added Barmar How do we know that they didn't make copies? Keeping the originals doesn't preclude that. We know from past investigations that Trump and his people are incompetent, this is certainly the kind of mistake they might make. It might even be a decoy.
Aug 15, 2022 at 21:07 history edited phoog CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Aug 15, 2022 at 21:00 history answered phoog CC BY-SA 4.0