Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Opinion-based" by Charlie Evans, Be Brave Be Like Ukraine, Joe W, CGCampbell, wrod
Became Hot Network Question
edited body
Source Link
user366312
  • 19k
  • 7
  • 64
  • 141

Considering the rising British Empire during the early 17th18th century and the current superpower, the USA, during the mid-19th century, and the USSR during the early 20th century, is China behaving any differently as a potential future superpower?

I.e., is there any noticeable difference between 21st-century china, 20th-century USSR, 19th-century USA, and 17th18th-century Britain in terms of imperialism and hegemonistic ambition?

Considering the rising British Empire during the early 17th century and the current superpower, the USA, during the mid-19th century, and the USSR during the early 20th century, is China behaving any differently as a potential future superpower?

I.e., is there any noticeable difference between 21st-century china, 20th-century USSR, 19th-century USA, and 17th-century Britain in terms of imperialism and hegemonistic ambition?

Considering the rising British Empire during the early 18th century and the current superpower, the USA, during the mid-19th century, and the USSR during the early 20th century, is China behaving any differently as a potential future superpower?

I.e., is there any noticeable difference between 21st-century china, 20th-century USSR, 19th-century USA, and 18th-century Britain in terms of imperialism and hegemonistic ambition?

Source Link
user366312
  • 19k
  • 7
  • 64
  • 141

The behavior of China as a future superpower

Considering the rising British Empire during the early 17th century and the current superpower, the USA, during the mid-19th century, and the USSR during the early 20th century, is China behaving any differently as a potential future superpower?

I.e., is there any noticeable difference between 21st-century china, 20th-century USSR, 19th-century USA, and 17th-century Britain in terms of imperialism and hegemonistic ambition?