Timeline for What would violate First Amendment rights by government action on social media?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2022 at 21:44 | comment | added | user5155 | @BillOnne That sounds like a completely different question to me. | |
| Dec 22, 2022 at 19:52 | comment | added | BillOnne | Consider the FBI paying Twitter $3.5 million to pay for suppressing people they directed to be suppressed. Would that count as an advisory role or taking action? | |
| Dec 20, 2022 at 10:01 | history | edited | user5155 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removing a reference to obscenities since that is not a content neutral example
|
| Dec 19, 2022 at 22:50 | comment | added | user5155 | One further complication that may arise just out of my own ignorance of the affair is if the FBI was in fact taking actions, or was instead performing an advisory role. Was Twitter making the content decisions based off of consultation with the FBI, or was the FBI proactively informing Twitter of individuals who may deserve a bit more scrutiny from the company's moderation tools? | |
| Dec 19, 2022 at 22:42 | history | edited | user5155 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 19, 2022 at 22:33 | history | answered | user5155 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |