Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 2, 2023 at 21:14 comment added Nick Carducci for Carface Bank I disagree. I used the word "and"
Feb 2, 2023 at 21:09 comment added Joe W That sounds like a lot of caveats that you need to add to your answer to explain that it isn't the typical shareholder voting that comes to mind when looking at your answer.
Feb 2, 2023 at 21:02 comment added Nick Carducci for Carface Bank For industry and state, non-binary, non-explicit approval pluralities are unitary by binary issues, which are always decisive with a smallest winning set as there are many choices and/or platforms. To maximize binary issue representation by sample modicum, make more choices and/or use approval voting for old ones. People are "strategic" to break the tie, unless something changes.
Feb 2, 2023 at 20:53 comment added Joe W Every system for shareholder voting that I know if is that one share gets you one vote. Which means if a company has 100 shares and someone owns 51 of those shares their vote will always win. If the remaining 49 shares are owned one a piece by 49 people their vote will never matter and all 49 can vote against the 51 share person and they will never win.
Feb 2, 2023 at 20:38 comment added Nick Carducci for Carface Bank @JoeW depends on the bylaws incorporated or notarized, of course.
Feb 2, 2023 at 20:37 comment added Joe W I would disagree as a shareholder vote can be controlled by a few people or as few as one depending on the amount of shares they have. If a small group or induvial has a a controlling amount of shares it doesn't matter what the rest vote as that group will always win the vote.
S Feb 2, 2023 at 20:34 review First answers
Feb 2, 2023 at 20:36
S Feb 2, 2023 at 20:34 history answered Nick Carducci for Carface Bank CC BY-SA 4.0