Timeline for Why would the SPD prefer a coalition where they are the junior partner to one where they are the largest party?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2023 at 6:56 | vote | accept | gerrit | ||
| Mar 1, 2023 at 22:12 | history | edited | ccprog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
addition error
|
| Mar 1, 2023 at 21:28 | answer | added | ccprog | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 1, 2023 at 11:44 | comment | added | Criticizing Israel not allowed | The SPD may simply agree on more things with the CDU. | |
| Mar 1, 2023 at 7:31 | comment | added | gerrit | @quarague True, maybe they're all deliberate rumours that aim to make the green party demand less. | |
| Mar 1, 2023 at 7:26 | comment | added | quarague | I would suggest waiting until the end of Wednesday to see whether this actually happens. The FAZ (a conservative newspaper covering all of Germany) claims Ms Giffey will announce this publically on Wednesday and even threatened to resign if this is not done. The other sources, like rbb24 all just write some version of 'there are rumors'. | |
| Mar 1, 2023 at 0:46 | comment | added | SJuan76 | Without knowing the details, two generic reasons: It is easier to deal with one partner than with two, or the demands (either in positions or in political actions) by Left or Greens are too burdersome for the SPD electorate. | |
| Feb 28, 2023 at 21:08 | vote | accept | gerrit | ||
| Mar 1, 2023 at 7:02 | |||||
| Feb 28, 2023 at 19:39 | history | edited | Rick Smith |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 28, 2023 at 19:34 | answer | added | Joe W | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 28, 2023 at 19:30 | comment | added | convert | The coalition where the Left are present seems to be problematic in curent situation. | |
| Feb 28, 2023 at 19:25 | history | asked | gerrit | CC BY-SA 4.0 |