Skip to main content
44 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 24 at 0:26 review Close votes
Feb 24 at 11:59
Mar 24, 2023 at 6:00 comment added Qiulang @WS2 the point I were making in my update was I don't know! I don't know whether Mr Vittachi's accusation were valid or whether the introduction about him(at my question) in valid, i.e. he is someone you can count on when talking about politics in Asia. So I updated my question. But from your reply I saw my intention was not clearly expressed.
Mar 23, 2023 at 17:09 comment added WS2 @Qiulang I thought the point you were making in your question was that the BBC was one of only two worldwide news organisations which covered it at all. Now you are sending me a tweet from someone complaining that the BBC gave it minimal coverage compared to elsewhere. So what do you think? Mr Vittachi is probably just as critical of the New York Times's coverage of China as he is of the BBC's. Just because the BBC has extensive worldwide coverage it does not mean that it follows anything other than its own editorial policy when covering news from places like China.
Mar 21, 2023 at 9:19 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
added 779 characters in body
Mar 21, 2023 at 9:08 comment added Qiulang @WS2 then what is your opinion about this tweet twitter.com/NuryVittachi/status/1635482295321722880 ? I don't know this guy Nury Vittachi or Fridayeveryday.com. It is probably a pro-beijing website. I can't tell.
Mar 15, 2023 at 8:42 comment added Qiulang @gerrit I heard that a lot but I also heard it is probably a stereotype. I never live there so I don't know.
Mar 15, 2023 at 8:16 comment added gerrit Because they're more interested in celebrity nipples, sports results, or the latest development in what one commentator said about what one political candidate said about another in the Republican Primary in Idaho?
Mar 15, 2023 at 2:55 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
added 240 characters in body
Mar 15, 2023 at 1:47 comment added Qiulang @PeterMortensen It is not a timestamp, just markdown but you can still click to play.
S Mar 14, 2023 at 21:47 history suggested Peter Mortensen CC BY-SA 4.0
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSNBC>, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC>, and <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube>).
Mar 14, 2023 at 20:46 comment added WS2 @JonathanReez The BBC believes it is the best international news service in the world - and it probably is. Like insurance, financial services and cartography, international news gathering is one of those industries where Britain has retained a role, applicable more to its pre-eminent 19th century position than to the country's relatively diminished status today. In the case of finance London is assisted by it's geography. E.g. The London FX market is open before Tokyo goes home for the night and it is still open when New York wakes up. The BBC has the same sort of advantage.
Mar 14, 2023 at 19:28 comment added Peter Mortensen Is 3.14 a timestamp? You can encode it directly in the URL (so it will immediately start playing from there), in this case appending &t=3m14s (eight letters) to it.
Mar 14, 2023 at 19:27 review Suggested edits
S Mar 14, 2023 at 21:47
Mar 14, 2023 at 6:45 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
added 6 characters in body
Mar 14, 2023 at 4:44 comment added Qiulang this is CNN world news on youtube today, so you can see it covers a lot, 2 reports about China, not no Iran and Saudi deal.
Mar 14, 2023 at 4:43 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
added 216 characters in body
Mar 14, 2023 at 1:56 comment added Criticizing Israel not allowed @Qiulang the comments are not the same as the question
Mar 14, 2023 at 1:31 comment added Qiulang @user253751 Can I suggest not to give the comment like that or my question would be seen opinion based and got closed.
Mar 14, 2023 at 1:29 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
added 512 characters in body
Mar 14, 2023 at 1:24 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
added 512 characters in body
Mar 13, 2023 at 23:24 comment added Criticizing Israel not allowed @StuartF Western countries might also be embarassed about such atrocities because they pay for them.
Mar 13, 2023 at 20:24 comment added JonathanReez @hszmv to give another example, the conflict in Ethiopia had about as many victims in 2022 as the war in Ukraine. How many nations dedicated at least 1 week of front-page coverage to that conflict? Probably zero, outside of Ethiopia and it's neighbors.
Mar 13, 2023 at 20:22 comment added JonathanReez @hszmv how often does German media reports on events in South America / how often does Australian media report on events in Central Asia? There's only so much space on the front page of a newspaper. Every country reports primarily on domestic events, then about China/US, then a bit about everyone else. The US isn't any worse in this regard.
Mar 13, 2023 at 17:37 answer added davolfman timeline score: 5
Mar 13, 2023 at 15:06 answer added hszmv timeline score: 20
Mar 13, 2023 at 15:01 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
added 23 characters in body
Mar 13, 2023 at 14:46 comment added hszmv U.S. news media is notorious for being very poor on reporting on international stories unless it involves U.S. interests or major tragedies. Americans as a whole do receive a stereotype of being rather ignorant of most of the international community with terrible geography skills and larger portion of the population who have never traveled abroad. That said, it's not entirely deserved, but it's not wholly undeserved.
Mar 13, 2023 at 14:36 answer added 264 champagne bottles on ice timeline score: 25
Mar 13, 2023 at 13:41 comment added sfxedit I voted not to close - let us see if the answers are indeed opinions, and not factual, before we close this question.
Mar 13, 2023 at 13:02 comment added Stuart F Does it have any immediate impact on the west? Stories from Iran or Saudi Arabia are normally only reported if they are particularly sensationalistic (the dismemberment of Jamal Khashoggi was an exciting story, but lots of other Saudi atrocities go completely unreported - e.g. the war in Yemen, or many other human rights abuses. Likewise a lot of Iranian news is unreported, and the women's protests are arguably under-reported despite a lot of sensationalistic detail.) Likewise, Chinese trade deals or diplomacy are seldom reported.
Mar 13, 2023 at 12:27 history became hot network question
Mar 13, 2023 at 8:07 answer added Jacob3 timeline score: -2
Mar 13, 2023 at 8:07 history edited Qiulang
edited tags
Mar 13, 2023 at 7:56 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
added 37 characters in body
Mar 13, 2023 at 7:50 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
added 37 characters in body
Mar 13, 2023 at 7:48 comment added Qiulang @Trilarion yes 2 days later I saw one too.
Mar 13, 2023 at 7:44 comment added NoDataDumpNoContribution "it is such a big deal" Is it? Nobody really knows. Maybe compare the US news coverage of the topic to other nations coverage (for example take some random country from each continent). Maybe you would find that most news organizations didn't cover the deal a lot. I myself am not sure how significant the deal is. I guess the future will tell. But I definitely saw one or two articles about it in the NYTimes.
Mar 13, 2023 at 7:33 history edited Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 55 characters in body
Mar 13, 2023 at 7:24 answer added Allure timeline score: 2
Mar 13, 2023 at 6:05 review Close votes
Mar 13, 2023 at 20:36
Mar 13, 2023 at 5:24 answer added o.m. timeline score: 8
Mar 13, 2023 at 4:33 comment added JonathanReez Why do you think CNN viewers care about this deal?
S Mar 13, 2023 at 4:22 review First questions
Mar 13, 2023 at 7:26
S Mar 13, 2023 at 4:22 history asked Qiulang CC BY-SA 4.0