Skip to main content
Post Reopened by sfxedit, convert, Timur Shtatland, SurpriseDog, Italian Philosopher
edited tags
Link
Timur Shtatland
  • 12.6k
  • 2
  • 34
  • 83
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by 264 champagne bottles on ice, Joe W, DJClayworth, xyldke, CGCampbell
Source Link
FluidCode
  • 8.7k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 60

What is the rationale of shooting toxic shells in an area that was meant to be liberated?

The UK authorities confirmed that they will provide depleted uranium shells to the Ukraininan forces.

As usual to divert the attention from the metal toxicity they pointed out the low radioactivity. Trouble is that Uranium should be on top of this list and none of the other items in the list is radioactive. An example of what Uranium can do was seen in a firing range in Sardinia. The area is open to the local population when not in use. There the US forces made the first tests of the depleted uranium shells while they were under development.

Now I am wondering if the point of this war is to free the territory to allow the Ukrainian population to go back there in the future why contaminate it?