Timeline for How are communist regimes nationalist?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2023 at 11:02 | comment | added | Stančikas | These new governments were not communist regimes. They also were doing many other things like privatization, etc. | |
| Jul 24, 2023 at 10:49 | comment | added | Rekesoft | @Stančikas Maybe there was not much hostility against ethnic russians while the USSR existed, but requiring the local language (if not outrightly forbid russian language) was a very common first move by all the ex-soviet republics. Trying to join NATO was the second one. | |
| Jul 22, 2023 at 9:56 | comment | added | Stančikas | It was consistent over all history of the Soviet Union. This explains why there was no much hostility against ethnic Russians in Baltic states. "Russians are the ethnicity that suffered the most from Stalinism", used to be heard. Nobody ever called them the higher race. | |
| Jul 22, 2023 at 9:44 | comment | added | Uk rain troll | Also when speaking about USSR and its claims, what USSR do you mean? Of 1929 or 1979? Those were two very different countries. There was no a uniform coherent USSR, it changed a lot during 70 years, though keeping some symbols | |
| Jul 22, 2023 at 9:31 | comment | added | Uk rain troll | USSR was continuation of a Russian Empire that existed for centuries, so it inherited most real life problems and issues from there regardless what they could say in Pravda newspaper. :) | |
| Jul 22, 2023 at 9:15 | history | edited | Stančikas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Jul 22, 2023 at 8:31 | comment | added | Starckman | Thx. You explained clearly the theoritical aspect, but not the practical aspect, which is the main part of my question: why in theory they are internationalist, while in practice they are nationalist? | |
| Jul 22, 2023 at 8:19 | history | answered | Stančikas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |