Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 6 at 13:27 review Close votes
Apr 8 at 20:45
Apr 2 at 8:33 history notice added Philipp Controversial Post
Apr 2 at 8:24 history protected Philipp
Apr 2 at 0:07 answer added user28660 timeline score: 2
Mar 24 at 7:11 answer added 264 champagne bottles on ice timeline score: 1
Mar 24 at 7:11 review Close votes
Mar 28 at 8:02
Jan 30 at 21:06 answer added Erel Segal-Halevi timeline score: 0
Jan 13 at 3:04 review Close votes
Jan 14 at 1:49
Jan 8 at 14:34 comment added Simd For those who want to study in depth, researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9010/… is helpful.
Jan 8 at 5:30 answer added Therac timeline score: 0
Jan 7 at 14:06 history edited F1Krazy CC BY-SA 4.0
Improve grammar
Jan 6 at 19:06 answer added dEmigOd timeline score: 7
Jan 6 at 18:21 answer added Italian Philosopher timeline score: 19
Jan 6 at 17:09 answer added sfxedit timeline score: 6
Jan 6 at 16:17 history became hot network question
S Jan 6 at 15:03 history suggested Ben Cohen
Question involves international law
Jan 6 at 14:17 review Suggested edits
S Jan 6 at 15:03
Jan 6 at 13:04 answer added Simon Richter timeline score: 9
Jan 6 at 11:22 review Close votes
Jan 6 at 13:56
Jan 6 at 9:57 comment added dEmigOd All this "international" law is an euphemism to cover for what more powerful nations do to the less- powerful ones. It is non existent, and rather an agreement based on the free will of specific sovereign nation. Once, Israel is done with one problem, I suppose, it will proceed to solve another. All the other naive claims, like how many rockets you supposed to swallow before a response, the answer is one is more than enough. Most of the time it is zero. And Israel gets them on the tens every single day.
Jan 6 at 9:37 comment added Wag the mainstream media dog @quarague the question is about military operation on Lebanese territory. Even though the IDF us already carrying strikes in response. I am more interested in general considerations though, not how it exactly applies to the Israeli situation.
Jan 6 at 9:19 comment added quarague This phrases the issue as military operation yes or no but one also needs to consider whether a proposed military operation would a) actually help against the issue and b) is in some sense proportiate to the attack. Neither of these are easy in any sense and trying to reduce this to a yes no question changes this from an interesting but almost impossible to answer question to something that looks more like a statement than a question.
Jan 6 at 8:16 history asked Wag the mainstream media dog CC BY-SA 4.0