Timeline for Two years after the breakout of Ukraine war, is/how is Russia successful in sustaining its economy (now even growing?) and the war?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 1 at 16:16 | comment | added | Steve | "That's 2.5% of the working-age male population which does not produce anything in the economy and which has to be supplied and paid for." - lots of jobs and positions don't effectively contribute to anything useful being produced. The benefit of a war economy is that workers are able to bargain much more strongly and get a bigger piece of the pie, that there is no longer a justification for an intentional reserve army of labour, and that workers themselves are massively improved with skills, training, abilities, and experiences. | |
Feb 26 at 10:59 | comment | added | MikeB | "[war materiel] adds to the wealth of products owned by the country" That is a debateable point for most nations, but for countries at war much less true. Even if we were to regard Russia's war machine as a saleable asset, between the loss of items, and the loss of perceived value due to poor performance, its hard to argue for any increase in value. | |
Feb 26 at 3:16 | history | edited | wrod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
Feb 26 at 2:58 | history | edited | wrod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Feb 26 at 2:53 | history | edited | wrod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 233 characters in body
|
Feb 26 at 2:45 | history | answered | wrod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |