An addendum to Phillips answer.
The graph is better if you show where people exist.
This isn't accounting for general trends like others mentioned, but looking at compositions, we can see a consistent gain in groups/trends where Mills and Z were active, vs a general drop in groups where Boomers and X are plentiful
Source for generation age definitions
Source for data, same as Phillip
An addendum to Phillips answer.
The graph is better if you show where people exist.
This isn't accounting for general trends like others mentioned, but looking at compositions, we can see a consistent gain in groups/trends where Mills and Z were active, vs a general drop in groups where Boomers and X are plentiful
Source for generation age definitions Source for data, same as Phillip
An addendum to Phillips answer.
The graph is better if you show where people exist.
This isn't accounting for general trends like others mentioned, but looking at compositions, we can see a consistent gain in groups/trends where Mills and Z were active, vs a general drop in groups where Boomers and X are plentiful
Source for generation age definitions
Source for data, same as Phillip
An addendum to Phillips answer.
The graph is better if you show where people exist.
This isn't accounting for general trends like others mentioned, but looking at compositions, we can see a consistent gain in groups/trends where Mills and Z were active, vs a general drop in groups where Boomers and X are plentiful
Source for generation age definitions Source for data, same as Phillip
An addendum to Phillips answer.
The graph is better if you show where people exist.
This isn't accounting for general trends like others mentioned, but looking at compositions, we can see a consistent gain in groups/trends where Mills and Z were active, vs a general drop in groups where Boomers and X are plentiful
An addendum to Phillips answer.
The graph is better if you show where people exist.
This isn't accounting for general trends like others mentioned, but looking at compositions, we can see a consistent gain in groups/trends where Mills and Z were active, vs a general drop in groups where Boomers and X are plentiful
Source for generation age definitions Source for data, same as Phillip
An addendum to Phillips answer.
The graph is better if you show where people exist.
This isn't accounting for general trends like others mentioned, but looking at compositions, we can see a consistent gain in groups/trends where Mills and Z were active, vs a general drop in groups where Boomers and X are plentiful
