Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 2 at 23:52 comment added sfxedit ... any such moves would get vetoed by one of the 5 permanent members. - doesn't matter as the UNGA has provisions to overrule the UNSC to counter the veto - look at my answer.
Oct 2 at 2:27 comment added 264 champagne bottles on ice @JonathanReez: yeah but they'll probably take revenge on Saudi tankers.
Oct 2 at 2:27 comment added Italian Philosopher Hey guys, take it to chat or something?
Oct 2 at 2:26 comment added JonathanReez @IVFcomesfromthetip it's just adds more humiliation for Iran: the rockets killed 1 person... a Palestinian. Now watch a ton of Iranian infrastructure get obliterated rapidly by Israel with Iranians having no power to stop it due to having severely outdated technology. A complete victory for Israel once again.
Oct 2 at 2:24 comment added 264 champagne bottles on ice Bibi vowed to respond edition.cnn.com/2024/10/01/politics/iran-missile-attack-israel/… I guess the Ayatollah will go up in smoke next. I wonder what the gas price will be by [US] election time.
Oct 2 at 2:18 comment added 264 champagne bottles on ice @JonathanReez: I guess you missed tonight's fireworks. Nobody of import killed but they surely pounded the ground reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/1ftu9qa/…
Oct 1 at 15:59 history edited Italian Philosopher CC BY-SA 4.0
added 362 characters in body
Oct 1 at 0:27 comment added JonathanReez @ItalianPhilosopher Based off what Israel is doing in Gaza, I suspect they're going for a scorched earth approach this time around. Anyone can be broken down if you apply enough violence, only question is how much violence is needed to bring south Lebanon down on their knees...
Oct 1 at 0:23 comment added Italian Philosopher @JonathanReez There is a difference between suffering a - massive - military setback and meek submission. Also, it's early days. I suspect this will not always be easy going for the IDF and I rather doubt Israel's goal of decisive victory, as stated on another answer, will be achieved. At a guess? Some level of back and forth until both are tired and call it quits - Hezbollah will not get rooted out. But, yes, so far Hezbollah has not been doing well, that's a fact.
Sep 30 at 20:35 comment added JonathanReez Hezbollah would lose face, massively, in Lebanon => didn't they already massively lose face? I can't name a bigger public humiliation in the past 50 years. To have your entire chain of command taken out or turned into paraplegics followed by the Supreme Leader's death is as bad as it possibly gets. Hezbollah would have to manage to kill at least a few hundred Israelis to save face, which is pretty much impossible given the disparity in technological development. Iran was likewise humiliated into oblivion when they failed to respond to Israel's missile attack.
Sep 30 at 12:36 vote accept machine_1
Sep 29 at 21:56 history edited Italian Philosopher CC BY-SA 4.0
added 351 characters in body
Sep 29 at 21:42 comment added 264 champagne bottles on ice @NoDataDumpNoContribution: nope; after much haggling it was put under chapter 6. Also, one of the more obscure points is that UNFIL can't go anywhere where the LAF doesn't want them to go. Which in practice is any site that Hezbollah deems 'sensitive'.
Sep 29 at 21:42 history edited 264 champagne bottles on ice CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Sep 29 at 20:57 history edited Italian Philosopher CC BY-SA 4.0
added 505 characters in body
Sep 29 at 20:51 history edited Italian Philosopher CC BY-SA 4.0
added 505 characters in body
Sep 29 at 20:45 history edited Italian Philosopher CC BY-SA 4.0
added 404 characters in body
Sep 29 at 20:37 comment added Italian Philosopher @NoDataDumpNoContribution I think I answered this or something related in the past. AFAIK the UN said at the time that they were not equipped or tasked with enforcement of 1701, beyond acting as a separation/observer force.
Sep 29 at 20:15 comment added NoDataDumpNoContribution Just out of curiosity, what is the enforcement mechanism in resolution 1701? Is there real force involved?
Sep 29 at 15:49 history answered Italian Philosopher CC BY-SA 4.0