3

With recent talks about removing the restrictions for allowing women on the front lines of combat, the question has been raised if this will weaken the military. We already allow women to serve as police and firefighters while meeting lower physical standards.

Have any studies shown a significant increase/decrease in performance when allowing in women who only meet the lower standards?

What is the rationale for allowing lower standards for women?

5
  • 1
    There is no indication standards will be set differently in the military so this question is a bit of a incongruous. In fact, given that each branch is setting their own standards over the next several months/years, with exceptions in roles still permitted, its highly unlikely this will occur as you postulate. Feb 13, 2013 at 5:17
  • @MichaelKingsmill, it is highly likely. No one expected standards to be lowered for Police/Firefighters either, but then someone sues because not enough women can pass the tests. Then because of disparet impact, under Title VII the government has to make sure that the test isn't biased against women, or if it is they have a vital need to discriminate in that regard.
    – user1873
    Feb 13, 2013 at 5:21
  • @MichaelKingsmill, actually lower standards for women has already occurred. The Army APFT standards are already lower for women.
    – user1873
    Feb 13, 2013 at 5:54
  • I would appreciate any objctive measure (injuries, lives lost, etc) I just dont know what metrics are currently in use.
    – user1873
    Feb 13, 2013 at 19:36
  • 1
    I think you could improve the question by a) focusing on either police or firefighters. They do completely different things so the effects are going to be shown in different ways. b) showing how the standards were actually lowered and c) focusing on specific metrics for the evaluation. It is possible you could have several questions you could ask. If they are all good questions they will be well received. If they are have half thought as this is then they will be received as this question has been. Feb 13, 2013 at 21:10

1 Answer 1

4

There are studies that demonstrate the benefits that female police officers bring to a force.

From Police Chief Magazine:

Women are consistently rated as trusted by their communities and, importantly, are motivated to serve communities in an era of decreased police legitimacy.2 Women have high levels of interpersonal communication skills, which translates into more effective practices in the field.3 Women are found to have a calming effect on male partners in high-stress and dangerous assignments, resulting in fewer police deaths.4 Higher levels of female representation are associated with organizations that emphasize community policing.5 Female police officers have a positive influence on the perceived job performance, trustworthiness, and fairness of a police agency, perhaps increasing the public’s willingness to cooperate in the production of positive public safety outcomes.6

Female officers are less likely to use force, use excessive force, or be named in a lawsuit than male officers.7 Research has found that male officers were more likely than female officers to be aggressive as a result of some quality of the encountered member of the public, such as race or socioeconomic class8 Even though studies show that subjects use the same amount of force against female officers as against male officers, and in some cases, more force, female officers are more successful in defusing violent or aggressive behavior.9

With this in mind, it should be clear that strategies that tend to increase the number of female police officers towards parity with male officers improve the performance of the force as a whole. And strategies that tend to prevent female officers from entering the force will tend to lower the performance.

By only allowing women who meet the same standard in running speed and endurance as men, you create an unbalanced force with few women and many men. These studies show that this has an overall negative effect on the effectiveness of the force.

1 Tim Prenzler and Georgina Sinclair, “The Status of Women Police Officers: An International Review,” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 41, no. 2 (June 2013): 115–131.

2 Natalie Todak, “The Decision to Become a Police Officer in a Legitimacy Crisis,” Women and Criminal Justice 27, no. 4 (2017): 250–270.

3 W. Dwayne Orrick, Best Practices Guide: Recruitment, Retention, and Turnover of Law Enforcement Personnel (Alexandria, VA: Smaller Police Departments Technical Assistance Program, international Association of Chiefs of Police, 2008).

4 Christine Jacqueline Johns, Effects of Female Presence on Male Police Officers’ Shooting Behavior (master’s thesis, Michigan State University, 1976).

5 Todak, “The Decision to Become a Police Officer in a Legitimacy Crisis.”

6 Norma M. Riccucci, Gregg G. Van Ryzin, and Cecilia F. Lavena, “Representative Bureaucracy in Policing: Does It increase Perceived Legitimacy?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24, no. 3 (July 2014): 537–551.

7 Kim Lonsway et al., Hiring and Retaining More Women: The Advantages to Law Enforcement Agencies (National Center for Women & Policing, 2003); Amie Shuck and Cara Rabe-Hemp, “Citizen Complaints and Gender Diversity in Police Organisations,” Policing and Society 26, no. 8 (2016): 859–874.

8 Judith Greenwald, Aggression as a Component of Police-Citizen Transactions: Differences Between Male and Female Police Officers (PhD dissertation, City University of New York, 1976).

9 Amie Shuck and Cara Rabe-Hemp, “Women Police: The Use of Force by and Against Female Officers,” Women & Criminal Justice 16, no. 4 (2005): 91–117.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .