-1

This may fall under the scope of Anthropology, but here goes:

I'm looking for a book which explores the question: What social/ political structures are humans naturally inclined to form?

  1. What social/ political structures are humans naturally inclined to form?
  2. If you were to isolate a group of people on an Island, what would the society look like after a few generations?
  3. What if you tried it with westernised people?

I'm not looking for a book that answers those 3 questions specifically, but similar ideas would be nice. Thanks

closed as too broad by Drunk Cynic, bytebuster, Avi, user4012, bilbo_pingouin Aug 16 '16 at 11:54

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Well, all the governments we have are what human beings are naturally inclined to form. Evidence: In nature, humans formed them. – indigochild Aug 9 '16 at 0:17
  • That depends heavily on the external environmental conditions. What's natural on a lush tropical island with abundance of resources and easy living is deadly in the Arctic; what works in the Steppe wouldn't necessarily be well adapted to the jungle. – user4012 Aug 9 '16 at 15:06
  • 1
    Yes, that is part of our world. A good answer would have to take into account not only all of those physical conditions, but also a huge variance in initial social conditions and the trajectories they could follow. It's an intractable problem. The entirety of political science is the answer to question (1). – indigochild Aug 9 '16 at 15:15
0

A book called Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations by Alan Page Fiske explores some possible answers to the question of what social/ political structures are humans naturally inclined to form, though it does not cover a specific scenario of people isolated on an island.

The four forms are summarised in this Forbes article by Rawn Shah, quoting a paper by Fiske, as being:

  • Authority Ranking (AR) –relationships are based on asymmetry ordered in some form of hierarchy. The people involved in this context have some rank understand on some level, whether implicit or explicit. Think of hierarchy in any company or in the military.

  • Communal Sharing (CS) – relationships are based on a bounded group of people who consider themselves generally undifferentiated from each other. Their focus is common beliefs, and they think it natural to be kind and altruistic to other people of their own group. They do not separate the notion of one person having more than another because in thought everyone shares the same things.

  • Equality Matching (EM) – relationships are based on maintaining balance between members of the group. The direction and magnitude of any imbalance is meaningful and noticed by others. People can keep track on some level of how far out of balance the relationship may be, although they may not do so based simply on altruistic bases. Think of the balance of and exchange of favors, or even unformed relationships—notice how upset people get when a single person car improperly uses the car pool lane.

  • Market Pricing (MP) – relationships are based on setting an explicit basis of value in ratios or rates on the interaction (e.g., just about every retail sales transaction is set on a common basis of currency value). The explicit exchange rate is rational –even if it seems outrageous at times – based on some balance of supply and demand.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.