7

Source

Interestingly, even after long sanctions and diplomatic melt down, they are buying 80 jets from USA (Boeing) and 50-60 jets from EU (Airbus).

Why did Iran order jets from USA and EU when they could have bought jets from Russia (UAC)? Also, why are not Russians desperate to secure the deal?

Note. Those who are saying that Russia can't manufacture large aircraft, take a look at this:
- Ilyushin Il-96
- Tupolev Tu-204

  • 4
    The answer to this is sure to be economics, not politics. "Why are commercial airlines all buying Boeing and Airbus?" will have the same answer as this question. – Cyrus Feb 11 '17 at 10:35
  • 3
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air. Iran already has a fleet of Airbus, so buying more of them is a technically good solution (personnel used to handling them, common spares, etc.). It did also manage Boeings, although they are now retired, so the decission of buying more of them is not surprising, either. And the size of the order makes sense in the context of an aging fleet that has not been getting spare or replacements for many years. – SJuan76 Feb 11 '17 at 12:10
  • There doesn't need to be a secret deal. It could be as simple as trying to get involved with politically connected businesses in the US and EU. Unfortunately, the very nature of a secret deal is speculative. Could it exist? Sure. But what could we do in terms of clarifying things? The US signed the Iran nuclear deal because the Obama administration was desperate for a Middle East deal. The EU countries were already interested in the oil. Iran didn't need to bribe either in my opinion. But that doesn't prove anything either way. – Brythan Feb 11 '17 at 15:39
  • 4
    Why do we by coffee from Columbia? Because that's where coffee comes from. Commercial Jets come from Boeing and Airbus. – user1530 Mar 14 '17 at 3:46
  • Considering how the US and Western Europe are liable to impose sanctions on Iran, I think this is a reasonable question. – Andrew Grimm Mar 15 '17 at 1:41
17

This is a matter of economics, not politics: nobody else makes large passenger jets. Antonov's largest seats 99 passengers, Embraer's seats 132, and UAC's seats 145. That's the same size as a small Airbus or Boeing jet. The 777-300ER they're purchasing holds around 400 passengers and has the range to reach almost anywhere in the world non-stop.

The Ilyushin Il-96 and Tupolev Tu-204 aren't possible alternatives, either. The Il-96-300 is produced at a rate of one per year and is smaller and shorter-ranged than a 777 or A330, while the Il-96-400 only exists on paper. The Tu-204 is half the size, has half the range, and is produced at a rate of two per year.

  • 1
    This is the correct answer. The question's premise (that "they could have bought...") is false. – phoog Mar 14 '17 at 3:39
  • 3
    This answer is up-to-date. For the reference, even Aeroflot (Russian state carrier) is not buying Russian-made jets. SSJ-100 are the only Russian jets in the fleet and those are short-range and smaller than B737 and A320. Also, the number of jets Iran ordered (130-140) is greater than the number of Il-96s (30) and Tu-204s (85) ever produced - since 1990. There is simply no capacity for Russia to fulfil that order in the foreseeable future. – Denis May 25 '18 at 11:32
  • 1
    So they could have bought 80 Tu-204 instead, to be delivered until 2058. – gnasher729 May 26 '18 at 23:25
  • (+1) The Il-96 and Tu-204 are also older designs that ought to be vastly less efficient than the Boeing or Airbus alternatives (the Il-96 is a four-engine aircraft “competing” against twin-engine designs!!) – Relaxed May 28 '18 at 19:43
1

It is hard to answer this objectively. I think this makes sense because most of economical sanctions were coming from USA and EU. What Iran is getting after lifting the sanctions is briefly mentioned here:

The EU will end its embargo of Iranian oil, which should pump more money into the Iranian economy. An increased supply of oil globally, perhaps an increase of a million barrels a day or even more, could well push the price down.

And the EU will, as well, end its banking sanctions, meaning that Iran will again be able to participate in the Swift system of electronic banking -- something that is essential to participation in the global financial system.

It is clearly arguable, but a correlation between a favorable political decision and a major business deal is highly probable.

Also, I think jets quality might play a role here. I know nothing about commercial jets assessment, but a quick search returns this small qualitative top, which clearly shows domination of Airbus and Boeing dominance.

1

Because Iran was under sanctions by the west for the past 3 decades, therefore Iran couldn't obtained any spare parts for its fleet of American made Boeing, therefore now they've got the chance to buy the new Airbus planes and I don't blame them, you have to consider the passenger safety, over the time they've purchase some Russian made aircraft but was not reliable.

You must log in to answer this question.