What do the terms 'Human Emancipation' and 'Political Emancipation' mean? And which one of these are promoted by capitalism?

  • 2
    Can you please link to where these are used? These are pretty broad terms that could mean a lot of things based on the context they are used in. Feb 20 '17 at 17:08
  • Looking at the tags it might be in the context of Marxism, but the question author should mention that in the question.
    – Philipp
    Feb 20 '17 at 17:17
  • I edited the tags. Human and political emancipation are terms often associated with a certain text by Marx. The economy-specific tags (communism, socialism, capitalism) were all unnecessary. Feb 20 '17 at 19:24

Marx discusses human and political emancipation in a (relatively) little known work, On the Jewish Question. There are many copies online for free.

Political Emancipation

Marx characterizes society under bourgeois as a place where rulers take their private concerns and turn them into public concerns (effectively pushing their personal preferences to the public, who cannot refuse them).

Political emancipation is a state of being where people are freed from this process.

For example, under the French ancien regime people were forced to accept the religious preferences of the state (Roman catholicism). This is a state without political emancipation. Contrast this with the 21st century America. The state does not overtly prefer any religion and citizens have freedom of (and from) religion.

This is important because it provides the bourgeoisie the ability to rule in their own economic interest without having to satisfy other social concerns. Although Marx doesn't use the term, it's easy to think of it as being similar to rationalization

These lecture notes from Florida International University provide this quote:

the modern State emancipates the Jews, not by freeing them from the domination of religion but by freeing itself from religion, by giving recognition to no religion and hence putting the Jews on an equal footing with everyone else

The Problem with Political Emancipation

Here is the problem Marx gets to: political emancipation frees the state, but it is a barrier to the freedom of individual citizens. Marx is a materialist, and as part of his project he claims that religion is something people cling to when their economic/material lives are unsatisfactory [Read more @ SEP]. When the rulers have freed themselves of religion, they are less constrained in oppressing workers. However, under political emancipation the public is still divided by religion, preventing them from either perceiving their oppression or resisting it.

Human Emancipation

The solution is the concept of human emancipation. Although Marx never really defines human emancipation, the way he contrasts it with political emancipation suggests that it is the actual emancipation of humans, not the state, from oppression.

Using religion as an example again, political emancipation from religion means that the state is now unconstrained by religion. However, citizens may still be religious and (in Marx's terms) are alienated from their labor by religion. Human emancipation from religion would indicate that citizens are no longer alienated from their labor by religion.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .